Nationals dump net zero by 2050, threatening coalition split as investors warn of super fund losses
This piece is freely available to read. Become a paid subscriber today and help keep Mencari News financially afloat so that we can continue to pay our writers for their insight and expertise.
Today’s Article is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.
Australia’s National Party has formally abandoned its commitment to achieving net zero emissions by 2050, triggering immediate political upheaval within the opposition Coalition and prompting urgent warnings from the investment sector that the policy reversal threatens billions in superannuation returns and economic stability.
The dramatic policy shift, confirmed following a party room meeting Sunday, marks a defining moment for the Coalition’s climate strategy and raises fundamental questions about whether the Liberal-National partnership can survive divergent positions on one of the nation’s most contentious policy debates.
National Party leader David Littleproud, who represents the Queensland electorate of Maranoa and serves as Shadow Minister for Agriculture according to government records, defended the decision Monday morning across multiple media appearances, claiming the emissions target endangers funding for essential government services.
“We’re streaking ahead when the rest of the world is pivoting on net zero,” Littleproud told reporters. “And net zero is not the only way to address climate change. This is about a common sense solution.”
The Nationals leader presented stark financial projections to justify the reversal: “When the net zero policy that Anthony Albanese is going to cost the Australian people $9 trillion, that puts at risk things like Medicare, NDIS, if we don’t have an alternative way.”
Littleproud emphasized that climate action remains a priority despite the policy change: “So we believe in climate change, we believe in reducing emissions, but we should pivot when the world pivots.”
Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.
Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.
Coalition Fracture Imminent
The National Party’s unilateral decision arrives before the Liberal Party completes its own comprehensive energy review, intensifying pressure on opposition leader Sussan Ley to either align with the Nationals or risk a second coalition split within twelve months. Ley, who represents the New South Wales electorate of Farrer, holds the position of Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for the Public Service.
When questioned by reporters Monday, Ley attempted to project unity while acknowledging fundamental disagreements: “They’re entitled as their own party to arrive at their own position and David Littleproud made that clear yesterday and we had a very convivial conversation about next steps in a process.”
She continued: “I’m looking forward to the work that will happen between now and the Liberal Party’s position becoming known and then us sitting down together as two mature parties developing something that takes the fight up to the Labor Party.”
However, internal Liberal Party tensions have already surfaced publicly. Senator Dave Sharma, Liberal representative for New South Wales and Shadow Minister for Financial Services according to parliamentary records, has openly suggested that a coalition split may be necessary if energy policy differences cannot be reconciled.
Nationals Cite Economic Research
National Senate leader Bridget McKenzie provided the most detailed defense of the decision during an extended ABC Afternoon Briefing interview, revealing that the party commissioned extensive research before abandoning net zero.
“We’ve been working with the Page Research Centre on a document to really investigate how the net zero strategy that we’ve adopted here in this country is impacting our community, our industries, the environmental impact, our ability to produce food and the like,” McKenzie explained.
She emphasized that climate action remains non-negotiable for her party: “Action on climate change is an absolute non-negotiable, but the reality is how we are pursuing lowering emissions in this country is failing our heavy industrial base.”
McKenzie cited specific expenditures to support her position: “We’ve already spent $3 billion this year alone on subsidising foreign companies to keep jobs onshore. It’s failing our regional communities for social and environmental impacts, and we believe there’s a better way.”
When pressed on whether the Nationals could remain in coalition with the Liberals if they maintain net zero commitments, McKenzie declined to establish explicit red lines but reiterated her party’s position.
“We’ve been very clear on the policy that we believe is right for our country,” she said. “We’ve been really unequivocal that net zero by 2050 won’t be working for our country. This year alone, PK, we’ve spent $9 billion and emissions haven’t come down. All we’ve done is funnel taxpayers’ money to foreign entities.”
On coalition stability, McKenzie offered measured comments: “I think our country is always best served by a strong coalition government. We’ve seen that for the entirety that the Liberal Party has been in existence. Obviously, National Party and Country Party have been around for over a century. But it’s not at any cost.”
Investment Sector Responds
The business and investment community reacted swiftly to the National Party’s announcement, with the Investor Group on Climate Change issuing a statement Monday emphasizing the critical importance of maintaining bipartisan support for net zero targets.
IGCC executive director Francesca Muskovic issued an unambiguous warning about the economic consequences of abandoning emissions targets: “Investors want to see broad political support for net zero by 2050, as well as the much stronger policies that are needed to accelerate the country’s rollout of renewable energy and clean industry.”
Muskovic connected climate policy directly to everyday financial security: “Until we reach net zero, floods, fires and droughts will become worse, productivity, food supply and community health will go down, and Australians will experience those losses in their superannuation balances and across their financial lives.”
The statement represents concerns from institutional investors managing trillions of dollars in retirement savings and reflects growing anxiety about policy instability affecting long-term investment decisions in renewable energy infrastructure and emissions reduction technologies.
Government Seizes Political Opportunity
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who returned to Canberra Monday after attending ASEAN meetings the previous week, immediately leveraged the Coalition’s turmoil to deflect criticism of higher-than-expected inflation figures and increased power prices.
Albanese, who represents the New South Wales electorate of Grayndler and serves as Minister for Public Service alongside his prime ministerial duties, directly attributed current energy challenges to Coalition dysfunction during their previous government tenure.
“What has occurred on power prices is a product and part of the dysfunction and chaos that’s been there of the coalition,” Albanese told Parliament. “24 out of 28 coal-fired power stations announced their closure. They had no plan to do anything other than fight each other and that’s continuing today.”
The Prime Minister’s comments represent a strategic effort to shift public attention from his government’s economic challenges to internal opposition divisions, presenting Labor as the party of policy stability despite mounting cost-of-living pressures.
Historical Context and Political Stakes
The coalition between the Liberal Party and National Party has formed the foundation of conservative politics in Australia for decades, with the partnership enabling electoral success across metropolitan and regional constituencies. The relationship experienced a brief rupture earlier in 2025, though both parties quickly reconciled.
The current dispute, however, presents more fundamental policy disagreement than previous tensions. Climate and energy policy have become defining political battlegrounds in Australian politics, with urban voters increasingly demanding aggressive climate action while rural and resource-dependent communities express concerns about economic impacts of rapid transition.
The Liberal Party faces intense pressure from multiple directions: moderate members in urban seats face voter bases demanding climate action, while conservative members recognize that abandoning net zero could make coalition governance impossible if the Nationals maintain their revised position.
For the Nationals, the calculation centers on regional economic concerns and voter sentiment in agricultural and resource-extraction communities where climate policy skepticism remains stronger than in metropolitan areas.
Policy Implications and Timeline
The immediate political timeline remains uncertain. Liberal Party sources indicate the energy review will conclude in coming weeks, though no definitive completion date has been announced. Party strategists recognize that extended deliberation risks appearing indecisive while rapid alignment with the Nationals could alienate moderate voters and members.
McKenzie indicated the Nationals will continue developing detailed policy alternatives to net zero: “We’ve got some more policy to do around fleshing out some of the minutiae around the policy ideas that come out of this paper.”
The opposition must present a unified policy position before facing voters, with polling suggesting that climate policy ranks among top voter concerns, though positions vary dramatically by region and demographic group.
International observers have noted Australia’s climate policy volatility, which has contributed to uncertainty in clean energy investment and complicated diplomatic relationships with Pacific island nations facing existential threats from climate change.
The coming weeks will determine whether the Liberal-National Coalition can maintain its partnership amid fundamentally different visions for Australia’s energy future, or whether the nation will see extended opposition division that could reshape conservative politics for a generation.
Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support
Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.
Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.
As well as knowing you’re keeping Mencari (Australia) alive, you’ll also get:
Get breaking news AS IT HAPPENS - Gain instant access to our real-time coverage and analysis when major stories break, keeping you ahead of the curve
Unlock our COMPLETE content library - Enjoy unlimited access to every newsletter, podcast episode, and exclusive archive—all seamlessly available in your favorite podcast apps.
Join the conversation that matters - Be part of our vibrant community with full commenting privileges on all content, directly supporting The Evening Post (Australia)
Catch up on some of Mencari’s recent stories:
It only takes a minute to help us investigate fearlessly and expose lies and wrongdoing to hold power accountable. Thanks!