Liberal Senator Calls Abortion Comments by Male Colleagues 'Not Helpful' as Ley Rebukes MPs
This piece is freely available to read. Become a paid subscriber today and help keep Mencari News financially afloat so that we can continue to pay our writers for their insight and expertise.
Today’s Article is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.
A senior Liberal senator described as “not helpful” comments by male Coalition colleagues about late-term abortion during parliamentary debate on unrelated stillbirth and parental leave legislation, adding his voice to growing criticism after Opposition Leader Sussan Ley publicly rebuked the MPs for “insensitive” remarks.
Senator Dave Sharma, the Liberal Shadow Minister for Financial Services from New South Wales, carefully navigated the internal party controversy during an interview with ABC’s Afternoon Briefing Wednesday, declining to criticize individual colleagues by name while making clear his personal view that their intervention was inappropriate.
“It’s not helpful,” Sharma said when asked about the perception created when “Liberal men stand up in the parliament” to discuss women’s reproductive healthcare decisions. “I’m never going to try and offer my own view on someone else’s lived experience. I can only offer my own.”
Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.
Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.
The controversy erupted after several Liberal MPs made comments during debate on legislation addressing stillbirth and paid parental leave that critics characterized as inappropriately injecting abortion politics into an unrelated matter. The MPs suggested women might seek late-term abortions to access welfare benefits, a claim that medical professionals and women’s health advocates have strongly disputed.
Opposition Leader Ley broke with party tradition of defending MPs’ rights to express personal views by publicly characterizing the comments as insensitive. Her rebuke drew criticism from some conservative members, including South Australian Senator Alex Antic, who “hit out at Sussan Ley for her criticism of conservatives,” according to the ABC program.
Sharma, speaking from Parliament House, demonstrated the delicate balance many moderate Coalition MPs must strike between party loyalty and personal conviction on contentious social issues. He emphasized the deeply personal nature of reproductive health decisions while stopping short of direct criticism of colleagues.
“Late term abortions are very traumatic and emotional and intense episodes,” Sharma said. “I don’t think anyone would ever undertake those lightly and not without a pretty compelling medical, personal, psychological reason.”
The senator’s comments directly contradicted the suggestions made by colleagues that women might seek late-term abortions for financial gain. Sharma stated he sees “no scenario where a woman is having a late-term abortion to gain the welfare system,” calling such a proposition implausible and not credible.
“With these sorts of issues, which are deeply personal and deeply traumatic, we need to be careful about second guessing people’s motives,” Sharma told the program.
The abortion controversy adds another dimension to the challenges facing Ley’s leadership as she simultaneously grapples with internal divisions over climate policy. The opposition leader’s willingness to publicly criticize party members over the abortion comments demonstrates her sensitivity to the political risks of being perceived as insensitive to women’s issues.
However, her intervention has created tensions with conservative party members who argue that MPs should be free to express their views on moral issues without fear of leadership reprisal. Antic’s public criticism of Ley reflects broader conservative frustration with what they perceive as the party leadership’s capitulation to progressive social positions.
Sharma, known as a moderate within the Liberal Party, provided a template for how Coalition MPs might discuss such sensitive issues without alienating key constituencies. His emphasis on personal experience and reluctance to “second guess people’s motives” represents an approach that acknowledges diverse views while maintaining respect for individual circumstances.
The senator declined to comment specifically on Antic’s criticism of Ley, saying he had not heard those remarks and would not “weigh in on the comments specifically of my colleagues.” Instead, Sharma offered his own perspective, carefully framing it as personal rather than prescriptive for the party.
The controversy highlights ongoing tensions within the Coalition between socially conservative and moderate factions, divisions that extend beyond climate policy to encompass a range of cultural and social issues. How the party manages these tensions will significantly impact its ability to present a unified front heading into a federal election.
Abortion policy remains largely a matter of state rather than federal jurisdiction in Australia, though federal legislation can intersect with reproductive health issues through welfare programs, healthcare funding, and medical regulations. The original bill being debated dealt with stillbirth recognition and parental leave rather than abortion policy directly.
Critics of the MPs who raised abortion concerns during the stillbirth debate argue they inappropriately conflated unrelated issues and demonstrated insensitivity to women who have experienced pregnancy loss. Women’s health organizations issued statements condemning the comments and calling for more informed parliamentary discussion of reproductive health issues.
Medical professionals have noted that late-term abortions are extremely rare and typically occur only in cases of severe fetal abnormality or serious threat to maternal health. The suggestion that women might seek such procedures for financial benefit mischaracterizes both the medical reality and the emotional toll of such decisions.
Sharma’s acknowledgment that late-term abortions involve “traumatic and emotional and intense episodes” reflects medical consensus about the circumstances surrounding such procedures. His statement that women undertake them only “with a pretty compelling medical, personal, psychological reason” directly counters the narrative his colleagues promoted during the parliamentary debate.
The senator’s measured response to the controversy demonstrates his political positioning as a moderate voice within the Coalition, someone who can articulate conservative values while maintaining sensitivity to contemporary social attitudes. This positioning may serve him well as the party seeks to broaden its appeal beyond its traditional base.
However, Sharma’s criticism of his colleagues, however carefully phrased, could expose him to conservative criticism within party forums. The balance between expressing personal conviction and maintaining party unity remains a constant challenge for Coalition MPs on social issues where party members hold divergent views.
Ley’s decision to publicly rebuke the MPs who made the abortion comments signals her determination to prevent the Coalition from being perceived as out of touch on women’s issues. However, her intervention has opened her to criticism from conservatives who see it as evidence of leadership that fails to defend party members expressing traditional values.
The controversy underscores the broader challenge facing center-right parties in many democracies as they navigate rapidly evolving social attitudes while maintaining support from socially conservative bases. The Coalition’s ability to manage these internal tensions may prove as important to its electoral prospects as its positions on economic and security policies.
As Parliament continues sitting through the coming weeks, attention will focus on whether other Coalition MPs express views on the controversy and whether Ley’s leadership intervention successfully contains the political damage or instead exacerbates internal divisions.
Sharma’s approach of acknowledging legitimate concerns about party positioning while declining to engage in personal criticism of colleagues offers one model for how Coalition MPs might navigate the tension. Whether other party members adopt similar strategies or instead defend the controversial comments more forcefully will indicate how deep the divisions run within the opposition.
Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support
Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.
Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.
As well as knowing you’re keeping Mencari (Australia) alive, you’ll also get:
Get breaking news AS IT HAPPENS - Gain instant access to our real-time coverage and analysis when major stories break, keeping you ahead of the curve
Unlock our COMPLETE content library - Enjoy unlimited access to every newsletter, podcast episode, and exclusive archive—all seamlessly available in your favorite podcast apps.
Join the conversation that matters - Be part of our vibrant community with full commenting privileges on all content, directly supporting The Evening Post (Australia)
Catch up on some of Mencari’s recent stories:
It only takes a minute to help us investigate fearlessly and expose lies and wrongdoing to hold power accountable. Thanks!