Government Defends Economic Record as Opposition Highlights 15% Food Price Increases, Living Standards Decline
This piece is freely available to read. Become a paid subscriber today and help keep Mencari News financially afloat so that we can continue to pay our writers for their insight and expertise.
Today’s Article is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.
Australia’s Acting Prime Minister defended the government’s fiscal management during heated parliamentary exchanges on October 29 as Opposition Leader Sussan Ley accused Labor of presiding over “the largest decline in living standards in the developed world” amid significant increases in food, insurance, and electricity costs.
Ley, Member for Farrer in New South Wales and Leader of the Opposition, directly challenged the government’s economic stewardship, citing specific price increases affecting Australian households. “Because of Labor’s economic vandalism, households are paying 15% more for their food, 20% more for their insurance and nearly 40% more for their electricity in the last year alone,” Ley told Parliament during Question Time.
“Australians are suffering through the largest decline in living standards in the developed world during Labor’s cost of living crisis,” Ley said. “Why is it that when Labor fails, Australians are always left to foot the bill?”
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, serving as Acting Prime Minister and representing Corio in Victoria, responded to Ley’s question, emphasizing that since Labor formed government in May 2022, “all of our focus has been on putting in place policies which ease cost of living pressures,” including more affordable childcare, wage increases, tax cuts, and cheaper medicines.
Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.
Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.
Marles acknowledged ongoing economic pressures while highlighting inflation moderation since Labor took office. “Today’s figures demonstrate is that Australian households are still under pressure and we understand that the work is never done which is why we will continue to pursue cost of living measures,” Marles said.
“The headline inflation rate today is about half of the headline inflation rate that we inherited when we came to office,” Marles told Parliament, arguing that economic conditions have improved from the situation Labor inherited from the previous Coalition government.
The government emphasized that core inflation has remained within the Reserve Bank of Australia’s target band for three consecutive quarters, attributing this achievement to prudent budget management. “That is in no small part due to the way in which we have been managing in a prudent way the Commonwealth budget,” Marles said.
Detailed fiscal comparisons formed the centerpiece of the government’s defense, with Marles citing spending growth rates under Labor versus the previous Coalition administration. “Annual spending growth under our government over the last three years has averaged at about 1.2 per cent,” compared to approximately 4.1 percent annual spending increases under the Coalition government.
Marles accused the former Coalition government of fiscal irresponsibility, stating, “They doubled debt before the pandemic and they left us with a trillion dollars of debt with absolutely nothing to show for it.”
Marles highlighted Labor’s budget surplus achievements, noting that converting “two Liberal deposits into two Labor surpluses” saved $188 billion on national debt in the last financial year. This debt reduction will result in $60 billion less in interest payments “over a decade,” according to the government’s calculations.
Sharp criticism of Opposition economic policy featured prominently in the government’s response. “At the last election, those opposite went to the election promising higher taxes, bigger deficit and bigger debt,” Marles said, citing Parliamentary Budget Office analysis. “And that’s not us saying it. That’s the PBO.”
The Deputy Prime Minister specifically attacked the Coalition’s energy policy proposal, characterizing it as a “$600 billion state-owned power plan” and noting that “the architect of it they have promoted to being the shadow treasurer,” referring to Shadow Treasurer Ted O’Brien, Deputy Leader of the Opposition representing Fadden in Queensland.
“They are now big government, big taxing, big spending people now,” Marles said, marking a rhetorical reversal of traditional political positioning where the Coalition typically advocates for smaller government and lower taxes.
The government also warned about potential Opposition policies around tariffs, stating, “That’s before the member of Canning gets his hands on it, when we’ll be seeing tariffs jacked up. They’ll close the door and then look at what happens to inflation,” Marles said, referring to Shadow Minister for Home Affairs and Shadow Minister for Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs Andrew Hastie, representing Canning in Western Australia.
The parliamentary exchange occurred against the backdrop of persistent cost-of-living concerns affecting Australian households across multiple expense categories. Food price inflation of 15 percent represents a significant burden for families, while the cited 40 percent electricity price increase over the past year has particularly impacted household budgets.
Insurance premium increases of 20 percent compound financial pressures, affecting home, vehicle, and other coverage costs. These price movements occur within a broader context of wage growth failing to keep pace with inflation for extended periods, resulting in declining real incomes for many workers.
Economic data referenced during the Question Time exchange was not independently verified during the parliamentary session, though both government and Opposition cited specific percentage increases and fiscal figures to support their respective positions.
The Reserve Bank of Australia maintains a target inflation band of 2-3 percent, and the government’s claim that core inflation has remained within this range for three consecutive quarters would represent significant progress in controlling price pressures if confirmed by official statistics.
Household living standards, measured by real disposable income per capita, have indeed declined in Australia over recent years, though comparative international rankings vary depending on measurement periods and methodologies. Several developed nations have experienced similar pressures amid global inflation following pandemic-era economic disruptions.
The political debate over economic management will likely intensify as the next federal election approaches, with cost-of-living concerns consistently ranking among top voter priorities in polling. Both major parties are developing economic platforms emphasizing household budget relief, though with contrasting policy approaches.
Labor’s strategy emphasizes targeted cost-of-living measures including childcare subsidies, energy bill relief, and healthcare affordability initiatives, combined with efforts to boost wage growth through industrial relations reforms. The government argues these interventions help vulnerable households while maintaining fiscal discipline.
The Coalition Opposition has signaled intentions to focus on broader tax relief and regulatory reduction to improve economic conditions, though specific policy details remain under development as the party rebuilds its platform following election defeats in 2022.
Economic forecasters project continued cost-of-living pressures over the coming year, with inflation expected to gradually moderate but remain elevated above historical norms. Household budgets will likely remain constrained even if inflation rates continue declining, as accumulated price increases persist while wages adjust slowly.
The political stakes around economic management are substantial, with governments historically vulnerable when voters perceive them as failing to address household financial pressures. The October 29 parliamentary exchange demonstrated how both sides seek to define economic narratives favorable to their electoral prospects.
Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support
Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.
Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.
As well as knowing you’re keeping Mencari (Australia) alive, you’ll also get:
Get breaking news AS IT HAPPENS - Gain instant access to our real-time coverage and analysis when major stories break, keeping you ahead of the curve
Unlock our COMPLETE content library - Enjoy unlimited access to every newsletter, podcast episode, and exclusive archive—all seamlessly available in your favorite podcast apps.
Join the conversation that matters - Be part of our vibrant community with full commenting privileges on all content, directly supporting The Evening Post (Australia)
Catch up on some of Mencari’s recent stories:
It only takes a minute to help us investigate fearlessly and expose lies and wrongdoing to hold power accountable. Thanks!