Australia Expands Under-16 Social Media Ban to Include Kik, Reddit
This piece is freely available to read. Become a paid subscriber today and help keep Mencari News financially afloat so that we can continue to pay our writers for their insight and expertise.
Today’s Article is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.
Australia’s government added Kick and Reddit to its list of social media platforms banned for users under 16, Communications Minister Anika Wells announced Wednesday, signaling that the restrictions will continue expanding as young people migrate to new online spaces.
The addition of the two platforms brings the total number of banned services to eight, joining Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), Facebook and Instagram in a sweeping effort to protect minors from potential harms associated with social media use.
Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.
Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.
Wells, the Labor MP for Lilley in Queensland who also serves as Minister for Sport, indicated the list would remain “dynamic” and could grow further as the government monitors youth online behavior and new platforms emerge.
The ban, which takes effect from next month, represents one of the most comprehensive restrictions on youth social media access implemented by any democratic government worldwide. The legislation passed Parliament earlier this year with bipartisan support, though questions remain about enforcement mechanisms and potential unintended consequences.
During an interview with ABC’s Afternoon Briefing from Parliament House, Wells defended the government’s approach to determining which platforms should be included in the ban and how the list would be managed over time.
“The list is dynamic and could expand,” Wells said, acknowledging that young people often quickly adopt new platforms when their access to established services is restricted.
Technology policy experts have raised concerns about the practical challenges of enforcing age restrictions across diverse platforms, particularly as younger users become more sophisticated in circumventing digital barriers. The government has indicated it will work with platforms to implement age verification systems, though specific technical requirements have not been finalized.
Privacy advocates have warned that robust age verification could require collection of sensitive personal data, potentially creating new risks for both young people and adults who must prove their age to access services. The government has committed to developing verification systems that minimize data collection while effectively preventing underage access.
The inclusion of Kik, a messaging app popular among younger demographics, reflects government concerns about platforms that facilitate direct communication between users with limited parental oversight. Reddit, a community-based discussion platform, was added due to concerns about young people’s exposure to unmoderated content and potentially harmful communities.
Industry representatives have expressed mixed reactions to the expanding ban. Major platforms have generally committed to complying with Australian regulations while noting the technical complexities of accurate age verification. Smaller platforms have raised concerns about the cost burden of implementing sophisticated verification systems.
The ban has drawn international attention, with several other countries monitoring Australia’s implementation as they consider similar restrictions. The United Kingdom and several European Union member states have debated youth social media restrictions but have not yet matched the comprehensiveness of Australia’s approach.
Child safety advocates have largely supported the ban, arguing that social media platforms have failed to adequately protect young users from cyberbullying, exposure to harmful content, and mental health impacts associated with excessive use. However, some youth rights groups have argued that blanket bans may be less effective than education and digital literacy programs.
The government has emphasized that the restrictions are designed to protect young people during critical developmental years rather than permanently restricting access. Australians aged 16 and above will continue to have unrestricted access to all platforms, subject only to existing content regulations.
Parents and educators have received mixed guidance about how the ban will affect their interactions with young people. Schools that use social media platforms for educational purposes may need to seek exemptions or find alternative communication methods. Youth organizations that use social media for outreach and support services face similar challenges.
Wells indicated that the government would monitor the ban’s effectiveness and make adjustments as needed. The dynamic nature of the list means that new platforms could be added relatively quickly if they become popular among young Australians.
The minister suggested that platforms demonstrating strong safety features and effective content moderation might eventually be considered for exemption, though she provided no specific criteria or timeline for such evaluations.
Technical implementation of the ban will require cooperation between platforms, telecommunications providers, and potentially age verification service companies. The government has allocated funding for enforcement mechanisms but has not disclosed specific budget figures.
Critics of the ban argue that it represents government overreach into parental decision-making and could drive young people toward less regulated online spaces. Some technology policy experts warn that determined minors will likely find workarounds, potentially accessing platforms through virtual private networks or falsified credentials.
Proponents counter that while the ban may not be perfect, it represents a necessary step in addressing the documented mental health crisis among young Australians, which many researchers have linked at least partially to social media use.
The staggered implementation, with the ban taking effect next month, gives platforms time to develop verification systems and communicate requirements to users. Wells indicated that the government would work closely with industry during the transition period to address technical challenges and minimize disruption.
International human rights organizations are monitoring Australia’s implementation, particularly regarding potential impacts on young people’s access to information and freedom of expression. The government has emphasized that the restrictions are narrowly tailored to address specific harms rather than limiting speech or access to information generally.
As Australia moves forward with one of the world’s most restrictive youth social media policies, the global technology industry and other governments will be watching closely to assess both the policy’s effectiveness and any unintended consequences that emerge during implementation.
The dynamic list approach adopted by Wells suggests the government recognizes that youth online behavior is constantly evolving and that effective regulation must be flexible enough to address new platforms and services as they gain popularity.
Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support
Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.
Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.
As well as knowing you’re keeping Mencari (Australia) alive, you’ll also get:
Get breaking news AS IT HAPPENS - Gain instant access to our real-time coverage and analysis when major stories break, keeping you ahead of the curve
Unlock our COMPLETE content library - Enjoy unlimited access to every newsletter, podcast episode, and exclusive archive—all seamlessly available in your favorite podcast apps.
Join the conversation that matters - Be part of our vibrant community with full commenting privileges on all content, directly supporting The Evening Post (Australia)
Catch up on some of Mencari’s recent stories:
It only takes a minute to help us investigate fearlessly and expose lies and wrongdoing to hold power accountable. Thanks!