The Reserve Bank of Australia shocked financial markets Tuesday by keeping the cash rate unchanged at 3.85 percent, defying widespread expectations for a cut as the central bank's board split for the first time under new governance arrangements.
Reserve Bank Governor Michelle Bullock said the decision reflected timing rather than direction, with the board wanting confirmation that inflation remains on track before proceeding with further rate reductions. The hold came despite headline inflation falling to 2.1 percent and unemployment remaining low at 4.1 percent.
"The board decided to wait a few weeks to confirm that we're still on track to meet our inflation and employment objectives," Bullock told reporters following the two-day board meeting. "What the decision today was about was about timing rather than direction."
The announcement marked the first split decision since the RBA implemented new governance structures, though Bullock declined to reveal how individual members voted, saying the votes remain unattributed to encourage frank debate.
Financial markets had priced in a rate cut with near certainty, leading to immediate reactions across currency and bond markets following the 2:30 p.m. announcement. The Australian dollar strengthened against major currencies while government bond yields rose.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers expressed disappointment with the decision, stating it would disappoint millions of Australians struggling with mortgage payments. However, Bullock defended the board's cautious approach, emphasizing the need to ensure inflation remains controlled.
"I understand that households with mortgages are very keen to see interest rates decline because it helps them with their cash flows," Bullock said. "I'm also really conscious that we don't want to end up having to fight inflation again. We want to make sure we've nailed it."
The RBA has already cut rates by 50 basis points since February, bringing the cash rate down from 4.35 percent. Bullock noted the effects of those cuts are still flowing through the economy.
The governor said board members who favored cutting rates had "a slightly softer reading of the data" and "a little bit more concern about the downside risks, particularly on the international side." However, she emphasized the disagreement centered on timing rather than the overall direction of monetary policy.
"The difference was not about directionally, it was more about timing," Bullock said. "I'll emphasize, I think I made the point earlier, that the difference was not about directionally, it was more about timing."
Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.
Your subscription to The Evening Post (Australia) directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.
Central to the board's decision was concern about recent monthly inflation data, particularly components suggesting underlying inflation in the June quarter could exceed forecasts. Bullock specifically cited house building costs and durable goods as areas of concern in the monthly consumer price index readings.
"There was a couple of components in that monthly CPI that suggested to us that the quarterly CPI might be a little bit higher than what we've been forecasting in May," she said. "That doesn't necessarily mean that we're off track, but we just want to get the data to confirm that we are pretty much on track."
The RBA will receive the June quarter CPI data before its next meeting in five weeks, along with updated labor market readings and revised forecasts. Bullock indicated this comprehensive data package would inform the board's August decision.
"By our next meeting in five weeks, we will have the June quarter CPI, another labour market reading, further information about international developments and an updated set of forecasts," she said.
While headline inflation has fallen dramatically from over 6 percent when the current government took office, the RBA remains focused on underlying inflation measures. The trimmed mean inflation rate, which strips out volatile components, reached 2.9 percent in the March quarter—just within the RBA's 2-3 percent target band for only one quarter.
"A lot of people focused on the headline CPI number at 2.1 percent, but we don't think inflation in a sustainable way is that low. We think it's higher," Bullock explained. "The underlying is the best read" because headline numbers are influenced by energy rebates and other temporary factors.
Global trade tensions featured prominently in board discussions, with Bullock noting that international developments "took up a lot of time at the board meeting over the past couple of days." While the likelihood of severe trade war scenarios has diminished since May, uncertainty remains elevated.
"The likelihood of a severe downside scenario associated with a trade war, which we set out in our May statement, that likelihood has abated. But this is a very fluid situation and we will continue to watch the data here and overseas very closely to see how things play out," she said.
The governor emphasized Australia's relatively insulated position compared to countries with more direct U.S. exposure, noting the nation's economic fortunes remain more closely tied to China. However, she acknowledged potential spillover effects from global trade disruptions.
"Our judgment, though, because we are not as directly impacted by the US itself, is that the impact, there will be an impact on us," Bullock said. "But we're not going to be anywhere near as badly impacted as some countries because we're not as directly linked to the United States."
The decision to hold rates drew sharp criticism from mortgage holders and prospective home buyers, with social media commentary questioning how many board members actually hold mortgages. When asked about such criticism, Bullock acknowledged the personal financial pressures but maintained the RBA's broader mandate.
"Personally, I don't know the answer to that question," she said regarding board members' mortgage status. "My message to them is that provided we are still on top of inflation, which is what we intend to be, and we're getting confirmation that we are, then yes, there is an easing cycle coming."
Young people struggling to enter the housing market received particular attention during questioning. Bullock expressed sympathy but noted interest rates represent only one factor affecting housing affordability.
"It's not only interest rates that are the issue for the young people, it's the housing prices. And there's nothing we can do about housing prices," she said. "The question of housing prices, of course, is nothing we can't do anything about, and that's a whole story for governments in particular."
The RBA's communication strategy faced scrutiny, with some market participants suggesting seven weeks of silence between meetings contributed to misaligned expectations. Bullock defended the central bank's approach, arguing quarterly statements provide comprehensive guidance on medium-term issues.
"We put out four times a year a statement on monetary policy, and it goes through all the things that you talk about. It goes through the outlook. It goes through NIRU. It goes through spare capacity. It goes through neutral rates. It's there. It's all there," she said.
The governor dismissed suggestions the communication strategy was failing, noting the quarterly documents have become "much clearer" and "easier to follow" compared to previous years. She emphasized the importance of explaining decisions to the public rather than solely catering to financial market participants.
"I'm trying to talk to the public. And I'm trying to help them to understand what we're focused on and why we're doing what we're doing," Bullock said. "Traders and market economists and so on, they've got all this other material they can go and look at."
Productivity concerns emerged as another factor weighing on the board's decision-making. Bullock noted continued weak productivity growth alongside elevated unit labor costs, though she emphasized wages growth has been moderating over the past year.
"Wages growth has eased over the past year, but growth in unit labour costs remains elevated alongside continued weak productivity growth," she said during her opening statement.
The governor acknowledged Australia shares productivity challenges with most developed economies, describing it as a "much more medium term sort of concept" rather than a month-to-month concern. She highlighted her upcoming participation in the government's productivity roundtable as evidence of policy coordination on the issue.
"We're not the only country with productivity issues. United States aside, most countries have seen slowing productivity. There are other issues that have got to be addressed and they're there for governments," Bullock said.
Market participants questioned whether the RBA was deliberately maintaining higher rates to preserve policy flexibility for potential future shocks. Bullock firmly rejected this interpretation, emphasizing the board's focus on domestic economic conditions.
"We are not keeping interest rates high just in case. We're not doing that. We are reacting to the domestic data, domestic inflation data and the employment data and trying to find our way through it," she said.
However, she acknowledged the RBA's improved position compared to the pre-COVID period, when rates had already fallen to 1.25 percent, leaving limited room for stimulus during the pandemic.
"Pre-COVID, interest rates were already down at 1.25 percent. We had hardly any room to move during COVID. So all I'm saying is that if something really bad does happen, we've got more room to move," she explained.
The split board decision represents a significant development under the RBA's reformed governance structure, which expanded the board and introduced new appointment processes. Bullock presented the disagreement as evidence of healthy debate rather than institutional dysfunction.
"What it demonstrates, I hope, is that there was really good active debate in the boardroom about the pros and cons of holding and easing," she said. "Reasonable people can have different opinions on what the right move is."
The unattributed voting system, recommended by an independent review, aims to prevent individual board members from facing external pressure while encouraging frank internal discussion. Bullock emphasized this approach suits Australia's institutional structure, contrasting it with the U.S. Federal Reserve's attributed voting system.
"The reason it was recommended that it was unattributed votes was that it would mean that people weren't subject to lobbying, it would mean that people could speak freely," she said. "US has a different system. They have professional pointed economists. They have presidents of Fed reserves. We have a different system, and this is right for our system."
Looking ahead, the RBA's August meeting will prove crucial for determining the trajectory of monetary policy. Bullock indicated the board would reassess based on comprehensive data rather than predetermined thresholds.
"What we'll be doing is we'll be looking at it in the context of where the forecasts think it is leading us and if we think it's leading us generally back towards the centre of the band then there'll be an opportunity to consider that for the board to consider that at the August meeting," she said.
The governor's closing message emphasized continuity with the RBA's inflation-targeting mandate while acknowledging the challenges facing Australian households. She highlighted the central bank's success in bringing inflation down from over 6 percent while maintaining low unemployment.
"Who would have said two years ago that we would be sitting here now with inflation at 2-something and unemployment at 4.1 percent? Not many people. So I think we've done remarkably well," Bullock said.
The decision leaves Australian mortgage holders facing continued pressure from elevated borrowing costs, while the RBA maintains its cautious approach to monetary easing. With financial markets now recalibrating expectations for future rate cuts, attention turns to the June quarter inflation data that will shape the board's next move.
The outcome reinforces the RBA's commitment to its dual mandate of price stability and full employment, even when that approach conflicts with immediate market expectations and public pressure for relief from cost-of-living pressures.
Got a News Tip?
Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.
As well as knowing you’re keeping The Evening Post (Australia) alive, you’ll also get:
Get breaking news AS IT HAPPENS - Gain instant access to our real-time coverage and analysis when major stories break, keeping you ahead of the curve
Unlock our COMPLETE content library - Enjoy unlimited access to every newsletter, podcast episode, and exclusive archive—all seamlessly available in your favorite podcast apps.
Join the conversation that matters - Be part of our vibrant community with full commenting privileges on all content, directly supporting The Evening Post (Australia)
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.