Federal Court Slaps $750,000 Fine on HCF Life for Misleading Insurance Terms
Australian Regulator Secures Major Win Against Health Insurance Giant in Consumer Protection Case
Why should you care about insurance fine print? Because it could cost you coverage when you need it most.
The Federal Court of Australia has ordered HCF Life Insurance to pay $750,000 in penalties after finding the insurer used misleading terms in its policies regarding pre-existing conditions.
A landmark ruling forces one of Australia's largest health insurers to pay substantial penalties and notify customers after the court found its policy wording could leave vulnerable consumers without coverage they believed they had purchased.
Key Takeaways:
HCF Life must pay $750,000 in penalties for misleading consumers about pre-existing condition exclusions
The ruling affects four insurance products in HCF's 'Recover' range that thousands of Australians rely on
Insurance industry put "squarely on notice" that contractual terms must align with legal requirements
The Federal Court has ordered HCF Life Insurance Company Pty Limited to pay a $750,000 penalty following last year's finding that a pre-existing condition term in certain insurance policies was liable to mislead the public. The Court also ordered corrective disclosures on the company's website as agreed by the parties.
"ASIC brought this case to ensure consumers were not misled about their rights and the extent of their cover by HCF Life's pre-existing condition term," said ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court. "The Court's findings and penalty handed down should serve as a message to insurers of their responsibility to ensure the information distributed to consumers is accurate and consistent with the law."
Justice Jackman, who presided over the case, found that while HCF Life had no intention to engage in misleading conduct, "the contravening conduct should be regarded as objectively serious."
The judge further stated that "It is also common ground that the conduct involved misrepresentation of the operation of an important exclusion in life insurance policies, and that the misrepresentations were made in [product disclosure statements] which consumers were entitled to regard as reliable documents, containing accurate and sufficient information as to the circumstances in which benefits would be payable."
In a statement that will resonate throughout Australia's insurance industry, Justice Jackman declared that "insurers are now squarely on notice that contractual terms may mislead consumers if the operation of those terms is modified by, or inconsistent with, provisions of the [Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)]".
The case centered on terms in four HCF Life products under its 'Recover' range: Cash Back Cover, Smart Term Insurance, Income Assist Insurance, and Income Protect Insurance.
ASIC's claim, which the Court accepted, was that the term could mislead consumers because it suggested HCF Life could deny coverage if a customer didn't disclose a pre-existing condition before entering the contract—even if a diagnosis hadn't been made and the customer was unaware of the condition when signing up. This contradicts Section 47 of the Insurance Contracts Act, which prevents insurers from excluding coverage where the customer was unaware of a condition and a reasonable person wouldn't have been aware either.
According to recent data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, health insurance complaints rose 17% in the last financial year, with coverage disputes ranking as the second most common complaint category.
As consumers across Australia review their insurance policies in the wake of last month's significant premium increases announced by major insurers including Medibank and Bupa, this ruling by the Federal Court serves as an important reminder of consumer rights in the insurance marketplace.
Do you understand what your health insurance policy actually covers? Share your experiences with insurance fine print in the comments below.
Got a News Tip?
Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.
More on Mencari
5 - Minute recap - for nighly bite-sized news around Australia and the world.
Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.
There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends
The Expert Interview - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.
Viewpoint 360 - An analysis view based on evidence, produced in collaboration with 360Info
Mencari Banking - Get the latest banking news and financials across Australia and New Zealand
The Mencari readers receive journalism free of financial and political influence.
We set our own news agenda, which is always based on facts rather than billionaire ownership or political pressure.
Despite the financial challenges that our industry faces, we have decided to keep our reporting open to the public because we believe that everyone has the right to know the truth about the events that shape their world.
Thanks to the support of our readers, we can continue to provide free reporting. If you can, please choose to support Mencari.
It only takes a minute to help us investigate fearlessly and expose lies and wrongdoing to hold power accountable. Thanks!