Digital Publishers Alliance Chair Calls for Urgent Government Action to Protect Australian Media Ecosystem
This piece is freely available to read. Become a paid subscriber today and help keep Mencari News financially afloat so that we can continue to pay our writers for their insight and expertise.
Today’s article is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.
Tim Duggan, Chair of the Digital Publishers Alliance (DPA) and founder of the former independent media company Junkie Media, used a keynote address at the National Press Club in Canberra to outline three existential threats facing Australia’s media industry and propose four concrete policy solutions, urging the federal government to act immediately to prevent irreversible damage to the country’s democratic information infrastructure.
What Happened
Duggan, speaking before an audience that included News Corp Executive Chairman Michael Miller, Greens Communications Spokesperson Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, and representatives from more than 150 independent digital publishers, framed Australia’s media landscape as a “Great Media Reef” — a complex, interdependent ecosystem that he assessed as sitting somewhere between “vulnerable” and “endangered” on a conservation-style threat scale.
He identified three primary threats: the predatory conduct of global big tech and AI platforms; sustained government paralysis in responding to that conduct; and an accelerating crisis of trust fuelled by misinformation and AI-generated content.
Why It Matters
The consequences Duggan described are neither abstract nor distant. Google’s shift to AI-generated search overviews has already caused a 33% decline in referral traffic to news publishers globally over the past year alone, fracturing what had been a functionally symbiotic relationship between search and publishing. Meta, meanwhile, abandoned Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code more than two years ago — and in the period since, the Australian government has continued directing an estimated portion of approximately $200 million in digital advertising spend toward Meta and Google, rewarding platforms that have actively harmed the local industry.
The AI dimension compounds the threat further. Duggan cited data suggesting that one major AI company scrapes approximately 24,000 pages of publisher content for every single human referral it returns — a ratio he described as illustrative of “what a broken ecosystem looks like.” He disclosed that his own published books — Cult Status, Killer Thinking and Work Backwards — were among 7.5 million titles allegedly ingested without payment through the pirated Library Genesis catalogue, used by Meta, OpenAI and Anthropic to train their models.
The trust dimension is measurable: three in four Australians report concern about distinguishing real from fake content online, the highest rate of such concern recorded anywhere in the world. Duggan linked declining news consumption directly to reduced capacity for misinformation detection and increased political polarisation.
Zoom Out
Duggan’s address arrives at a moment of genuine structural fragility for independent Australian publishing. While large organisations including Nine, Seven, News Corp and national broadcasters ABC and SBS retain resources to weather market disruption, smaller and mid-sized independent publishers — which Duggan characterised as the most agile and community-connected part of the ecosystem — lack the balance sheets to absorb prolonged platform hostility and legislative delay.
The proposed News Bargaining Incentive, the government’s successor mechanism to the news media bargaining code, was again pushed back from the parliamentary agenda in the days before the address. For Duggan, the pace mismatch is structural: “The slow speed of government is being strangled by the fast pace of technology.”
His four proposed solutions carry genuine policy precedent. A journalist salary tax offset, modelled on the existing 30-to-40% producer offset for film and television content — which returned $713 million to the Australian screen industry in the last financial year — could, according to economic analysis by expert Megan Brownlow, generate approximately $216 million annually for journalism if applied at a comparable rate. Denmark, Sweden, France and Canada have all deployed similar tax reduction schemes for news industries.
On copyright, Duggan argued that the enforcement mechanism already exists: the Copyright Act, in operation since 1968 and administered through the Copyright Agency for more than 50 years, already provides the licensing framework AI companies claim is unworkable. Media monitoring companies such as Isentia and Meltwater already operate under licensed content-scraping arrangements. The argument that AI companies cannot do the same, Duggan suggested, was not a technical constraint but a political choice.
On government advertising, the $250 million annual federal advertising budget currently flowing substantially to offshore platforms represents a lever that has, according to Duggan, never been modelled against the alternative: the combined reach of every domestic television network, out-of-home operator, magazine, radio station, independent publisher and community newspaper. He pointed to New York City’s 2019 commitment to direct at least 50% of its print and digital advertising to community and ethnic media — an initiative that reached more than 220 outlets in its first year — as an existing proof of concept.
The fourth proposal, a restructured News Bargaining Incentive with an explicit set-aside for smaller independent publishers, would address what Duggan characterised as the central failure of the original bargaining code: that its benefits flowed overwhelmingly to the largest media organisations, leaving independent publishers underserved. A rare joint statement from the DPA, Local Independent News Association, Community Broadcast Association of Australia, Public Interest Journalism Initiative, Independent Multicultural Media Australia, and the Alliance for Journalist Freedom — the first such united position from smaller publisher bodies — formally endorsed this principle.
Bottom Line
Duggan’s argument is ultimately about civic infrastructure, not industry lobbying: that a government willing to spend tens of millions in advertising on Meta while delaying media support legislation for 30 months is making an active choice to weaken the democratic information environment it depends on. The four proposals he outlined — a journalist tax offset, copyright enforcement, domestic advertising repatriation and an equitable News Bargaining Incentive — are not aspirational. They are adoptable, partially precedented and politically available right now. The question, as Duggan framed it, is not whether Australia can afford to act. It is whether it can afford not to.
Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support
Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.
Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week’s newsletter.