Commonwealth Bank Reverses AI Job Cuts After Union Pressure

Commonwealth Bank admits error, allows 45 customer service workers to keep positions following Fair Work dispute

Aug 21, 2025

Today’s email is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has reversed plans to cut 45 customer service jobs and replace them with artificial intelligence technology, admitting the decision was made in error after weeks of union pressure and a formal workplace dispute.

The nation's largest bank announced in July it would eliminate the positions and introduce an AI-powered "voice bot" to handle customer calls, claiming the technology would reduce call volumes and improve efficiency. The Finance Sector Union challenged the decision, presenting evidence that call volumes were actually increasing rather than declining.

CBA confirmed Tuesday that affected workers can now choose to remain in their current roles or accept voluntary redundancy packages. The reversal came after the union filed a dispute with the Fair Work Commission and workers provided testimony contradicting the bank's assessment of operational needs.

"This is a massive win for workers, proving what can be achieved when members stand together," said Julia Angrisano, Finance Sector Union National Secretary. "CBA has been caught out trying to dress up job cuts as innovation. Using AI as a cover for slashing secure jobs is a cynical cost-cutting exercise, and workers know it."

Union Evidence Contradicts Bank Claims

The union's case centered on worker accounts that directly challenged CBA's rationale for the job cuts. Employee representatives told union officials that call volumes were rising, forcing management to offer overtime shifts and deploy team leaders to answer phones alongside regular customer service staff.

"Our members told us a very different story to what CBA was laying out," Angrisano said in an ABC Radio interview. "What they were saying was that actually call volumes were rising and that management was having to scramble and to ask workers to perform extra shifts and overtime."

The contradiction between management projections and operational reality became a key factor in the union's Fair Work Commission dispute. Workers questioned how introducing AI technology would address increasing demand when the bank was already struggling to manage current call volumes with existing staff levels.

"Our members were saying, we can't see how the introduction of this voice bot is actually going to manage what is an increasing call volume," Angrisano said.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.

Transparency Concerns Drive Dispute

The union's challenge also focused on CBA's decision-making process, particularly the lack of transparency around how the 45 affected workers were selected for redundancy. Union representatives said the bank failed to provide clear criteria for the job cuts or demonstrate that alternatives to redundancy had been considered.

"CBA just weren't transparent about how they were making decisions to replace these jobs with that voice bot," Angrisano said. "How were these workers going to be replaced? What was that call volume going to look like? How did they make that assessment? And essentially, how did they choose these 45 workers?"

The union argued that proper consultation should have occurred before any final decisions were made, allowing workers to contribute insights about operational realities that technology assessments might miss.

"Because the bank had refused to be transparent about those core volumes, it's the reason we initiated that dispute," Angrisano said. "And I think it was that pressure that resulted in this decision yesterday where CBA has now said, we've made a mistake and they've backflipped on cutting those jobs."

Workers Face Lasting Impact

Despite the reversal, union officials said the 45 affected workers have already suffered significant stress during weeks of uncertainty about their employment future. The experience has created broader anxiety across CBA's call center operations and other departments where similar AI implementation might be considered.

"For many of those workers, I'd say the damage has already been done," Angrisano said. "They've had to endure a lot of stress and worry facing this very insecure future."

The union emphasized that early consultation with workers could prevent similar situations, arguing that employees often have insights into operational challenges that technology specialists might overlook.

"What workers proved was actually they knew exactly what was going on in a way that actually the technology people had no line of sight to," Angrisano said. "And so if we bring workers in early, well before decisions are made, then we can absolutely avoid these types of circumstances."

Broader Industry Implications

The CBA case represents a significant test of how Australian financial institutions implement AI technology while managing workforce concerns. The Finance Sector Union warned that similar "efficiency measures" disguised as digital transformation are being considered across the banking sector.

"This case is just the tip of the iceberg," the union said in a statement. The organization is collecting member accounts about how automation, offshoring and AI implementation are affecting workloads and job security throughout the industry.

"Our members want to be part of the conversation about how new technology is used in banking," Angrisano said. "They want secure jobs today and the training needed for the jobs of the future, not to be discarded under the guise of efficiency."

Ongoing Legal Proceedings

The Fair Work Commission dispute continues despite CBA's reversal of the job cuts. The union is seeking clarity about the bank's decision-making process and what alternatives to redundancy were considered before the AI implementation was announced.

Another hearing is scheduled for August 25, where the union will pursue questions about worker selection criteria and the bank's assessment of operational needs. Union representatives said they want to establish principles for future AI implementation that include meaningful worker consultation.

"We are still in dispute with the Commonwealth Bank about this decision," Angrisano said. "What we still don't have any clarity around is on what basis did the bank determine that these jobs were no longer required and why were these particular individuals selected?"

Technology and Workforce Balance

The CBA reversal highlights tensions between technological advancement and workforce stability in Australia's financial services sector. While banks increasingly adopt AI and automation to improve efficiency and reduce costs, unions argue that proper consultation and retraining programs should accompany such changes.

"CBA likes to talk about being a digital leader, but real leadership means investing in your people, not tossing them aside and blaming the technology," Angrisano said.

The case may influence how other major banks approach AI implementation, particularly regarding worker consultation and the assessment of operational impacts before job cuts are announced.

CBA has apologized to affected workers and confirmed they can choose to remain in their positions or accept voluntary redundancy packages. The bank has not provided detailed comment on its future AI implementation strategy or consultation processes for technology-driven workforce changes.

The Fair Work Commission dispute continues as the union seeks to establish broader principles for AI implementation in the banking sector that protect worker interests while allowing technological advancement.

Mencari tried to contact the CBA Media team for comment but no reply.

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support

Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.

Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.

As well as knowing you’re keeping Mencari (Australia) alive, you’ll also get:

Get breaking news AS IT HAPPENS - Gain instant access to our real-time coverage and analysis when major stories break, keeping you ahead of the curve
Unlock our COMPLETE content library - Enjoy unlimited access to every newsletter, podcast episode, and exclusive archive—all seamlessly available in your favorite podcast apps.
Join the conversation that matters - Be part of our vibrant community with full commenting privileges on all content, directly supporting The Evening Post (Australia)

JOIN NOW TO SUPPORT US