This piece is freely available to read. Become a paid subscriber today and help keep Mencari News financially afloat so that we can continue to pay our writers for their insight and expertise.
Today’s Article is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.
Shadow Communications Minister Melissa McIntosh has written to Communications Minister Anika Wells demanding doubled penalties for telecommunications companies that fail to provide triple zero emergency services and creation of a public register tracking all outages, following a series of life-threatening network failures across multiple carriers.
Australia’s opposition has escalated pressure on the Albanese government to dramatically strengthen penalties and transparency requirements for telecommunications failures affecting emergency services, proposing fines be doubled from $10 million and all triple zero outages be publicly disclosed.
Shadow Communications Minister Melissa McIntosh confirmed Tuesday she has formally written to Communications Minister Anika Wells urging acceptance of Coalition amendments to telecommunications legislation that would transform accountability for network failures affecting the nation’s critical emergency call system.
“We want to work with you. We think that telcos that do wrong by Australians, particularly when it comes to life and death over triple zero, should be fined more,” McIntosh told Sky News Tuesday. “$10 million is obviously not enough because this still happens. So double the fines.”
The Shadow Minister’s intervention comes after the government provided opposition members “less than 24 hours’ notice that the legislation was coming through” despite having “sat on recommendations for a year and a half and did nothing,” according to McIntosh’s Tuesday comments.
Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.
Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.
The Coalition’s proposed amendments, which were voted down by the government, would have increased maximum penalties for triple zero service failures from $10 million to $20 million and mandated creation of a publicly accessible registry documenting all emergency service outages across telecommunications carriers.
“I’m also calling for a public register of triple zero outages,” McIntosh stated. “So Australians have that transparency and they have that confidence because we know it’s not just Optus—there are all the telcos have issues with outages and we also know that other telcos including the NBN had a triple zero outage.”
The reference to multiple carriers experiencing failures underscores the systemic nature of the problem, with McIntosh emphasizing that no major telecommunications provider has maintained a perfect record on emergency service reliability.
“So australians have a right to know what’s going on behind the scenes and to have confidence in our most essential telecommunications service,” McIntosh argued. “At the very least they deserve to be able to pick up the phone and make that very important phone call in their time of need.”
The push for transparency through a public register represents a departure from current practice, where outage information typically emerges through media reports, customer complaints or regulatory investigations rather than proactive disclosure.
McIntosh characterized emergency service reliability as fundamental to government responsibilities.
“Looking after your citizens is the most important job of a government,” she stated. “And I’ve been pressing so hard over these weeks on this because it is about people’s lives.”
The Shadow Minister said her persistent advocacy reflects the life-or-death stakes involved when emergency communications fail.
“We said, these are the recommendations that we want, and the government voted them down,” McIntosh recounted. “But I think they’re really important. So I’ve written to the minister and said, We want to work with you.”
The Coalition’s cooperative framing—offering to work with the government rather than simply opposing—suggests recognition that telecommunications reform requires bipartisan support given the technical complexity and industry relationships involved.
Minister Wells has not yet publicly responded to McIntosh’s letter, with Tuesday’s media availability focused entirely on the social media age ban announcement rather than telecommunications infrastructure issues.
The timing of McIntosh’s revelation about her correspondence coincided with Wells’ high-profile social media campaign launch, potentially complicating the government’s communications agenda with a separate but equally pressing technology policy debate.
McIntosh’s emphasis on “triple zero custodian and network” issues in her letter highlights concerns about both the telecommunications companies providing underlying network services and the administrative entities responsible for routing emergency calls.
Australia’s emergency call system relies on multiple layers of infrastructure and oversight, including network providers, emergency service aggregators and government regulators, creating potential failure points at each level.
Recent high-profile outages have exposed vulnerabilities in this complex system, with some emergencies going unreported or delayed due to network failures affecting the triple zero service.
The Shadow Minister’s reference to NBN experiencing triple zero outages complicates the political dynamics, as the government-owned National Broadband Network’s involvement suggests the issue extends beyond purely commercial carrier failures.
“Telcos that do wrong by Australians, particularly when it comes to life and death over triple zero, should be fined more,” McIntosh repeated, framing the issue as both a regulatory enforcement matter and a fundamental question of citizen safety.
The proposed doubling of maximum fines from $10 million to $20 million would significantly increase financial consequences for major carriers, though industry analysts suggest even $20 million penalties may represent a relatively modest percentage of annual revenues for Australia’s largest telecommunications companies.
Telstra, Optus and TPG Telecom—Australia’s three largest carriers—each generate annual revenues in the billions of dollars, suggesting that even doubled fines might function primarily as reputational penalties rather than financially crippling sanctions.
However, public register requirements could generate sustained reputational damage by creating permanent, searchable records of each carrier’s emergency service failures, potentially influencing customer decisions and regulatory scrutiny.
“Australians have that transparency and they have that confidence,” McIntosh stated as the goal of public disclosure, suggesting the reform aims to empower consumers with information as much as to punish carriers.
The Coalition’s advocacy for transparency measures reflects broader political trends toward open data and public accountability in government services and regulated industries, with emergency services representing a particularly compelling case given the life-safety implications.
McIntosh did not specify what format the proposed public register would take, though similar transparency initiatives in other sectors have ranged from simple spreadsheets posted on government websites to sophisticated searchable databases with mapping capabilities and historical trend analysis.
The Shadow Minister’s characterization of triple zero as “our most essential telecommunications service” positions the issue above commercial considerations about costs, technical challenges or industry concerns about competitive disadvantage from public disclosure.
By framing emergency service reliability as non-negotiable rather than subject to the usual regulatory cost-benefit balancing, McIntosh attempts to foreclose government arguments that increased penalties or transparency requirements might be excessive or administratively burdensome.
The Coalition’s decision to pursue these reforms through direct outreach to the minister rather than purely through parliamentary speeches or media campaigns suggests genuine interest in legislative outcomes rather than simply political positioning ahead of elections.
“We want to work with you,” McIntosh emphasized, offering collaboration despite the government having voted down similar recommendations previously.
The Shadow Minister’s Tuesday comments revealed frustration with the consultation process on the original legislation, noting the opposition received inadequate time to review proposals despite the government having access to expert recommendations for eighteen months.
“The government had sat on recommendations for a year and a half and did nothing,” McIntosh stated, suggesting the rushed legislative process represented avoidable mismanagement rather than necessary urgency.
The combination of doubled fines and public register requirements represents a two-pronged approach to telecommunications accountability—financial penalties to deter failures and transparency measures to enable public scrutiny.
Whether the government accepts the Coalition’s recommendations remains unclear, with Minister Wells focused on implementing the social media age ban rather than addressing telecommunications infrastructure reforms in her recent public statements.
The political dynamics around telecommunications regulation involve complex relationships with industry, technical expertise constraints, and federal-state coordination on emergency services, making reform more challenging than simple legislative amendments might suggest.
However, McIntosh’s public advocacy and formal written request to Wells ensures the issue remains on the government’s agenda regardless of immediate legislative action, potentially building momentum for future reforms or influencing regulatory guidance to the telecommunications industry.
Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support
Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.
Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.
As well as knowing you’re keeping Mencari (Australia) alive, you’ll also get:
Get breaking news AS IT HAPPENS - Gain instant access to our real-time coverage and analysis when major stories break, keeping you ahead of the curve
Unlock our COMPLETE content library - Enjoy unlimited access to every newsletter, podcast episode, and exclusive archive—all seamlessly available in your favorite podcast apps.
Join the conversation that matters - Be part of our vibrant community with full commenting privileges on all content, directly supporting The Evening Post (Australia)
Catch up on some of Mencari’s recent stories:
It only takes a minute to help us investigate fearlessly and expose lies and wrongdoing to hold power accountable. Thanks!