Australia Locks Under-16s Out of Social Media Tomorrow—Age Checks May Hit Everyone
This piece is freely available to read. Become a paid subscriber today and help keep Mencari News financially afloat so that we can continue to pay our writers for their insight and expertise.
Today’s Article is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.
Australia’s social media ban for anyone under 16 takes effect December 10, forcing platforms to self-assess compliance and potentially requiring age verification from millions of users—even those nowhere near 16—or face penalties from the eSafety Commissioner.
The big change
Starting tomorrow, Australian social media platforms must prevent users under 16 from accessing their services or face enforcement action from the eSafety Commissioner. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese released a video message played in classrooms nationwide, urging affected teens to “make the most of the school holidays” by starting sports, learning instruments, reading books, or spending “quality time with your friends and your family face to face” (PM’s office video message, December 9, 2024).
Why it matters to me (Gen Z): If you’re 16-25 in Australia or use platforms that serve Australian users, you may be asked to prove your age starting tomorrow—even if you’re clearly not a teenager. Platforms have full discretion on which verification systems to deploy, and there’s no clear exemption list yet.
Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.
Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. There is no corporate influence involved. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.
Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.
The legislation places the compliance burden entirely on platforms, not parents or teens. Joanna Weaver, Executive Director of the Tech Policy Design Institute, told Sky News that “the obligation is on the platforms to self-assess,” meaning each company decides independently whether the ban applies to them and how aggressively to enforce age checks.
What “social media” actually means under this law
What is the scope? Many Australians assume only the platforms explicitly named by the eSafety Commissioner—such as TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and X—will be affected. Weaver warned this is “one of the biggest misperceptions.” Because platforms must self-assess, the ban could sweep up a far broader range of services than the public expects, from gaming chat features to community forums. “Depending on which social media platforms different people use, it will affect us differently,” she said (Sky News, December 9, 2024).
The age-verification wildcard
Platforms will likely require some users to verify they are over 16, potentially through government ID uploads, facial scans, or third-party age-estimation tools. Weaver emphasized that “people who might consider themselves not even remotely in the area of age 16 might suddenly be having to prove that they’re actually over 16” (Sky News, December 9, 2024). No central verification system exists; each platform chooses its own method.
Australian privacy and tech policy groups have raised concerns about biometric data collection and the risk that verification databases become targets for hackers. The government has committed to privacy reforms but has not yet released details on how verification data will be protected.
What happens if teens find workarounds
Weaver stressed the need for adults to have “conversations with [teens] about what this change will mean, not just about saying to them, ‘It’s now illegal for you to be on the platform,’ but also to be having a conversation about what happens if they are on a platform” (Sky News, December 9, 2024). Her key concern: teens who circumvent the ban may migrate to “parts of the internet that are less regulated” and encounter harmful content without recourse to help.
The law does not penalize individual users or parents—only platforms. Fines can reach tens of millions of dollars for companies that fail to demonstrate “reasonable steps” to exclude under-16s.
What comes next
Both Albanese and Youth Affairs Minister Annika Wells have described the ban as a “first step” in a broader package. Weaver outlined several additional measures the government has committed to:
Industry co-regulatory codes (eSafety Commission): New rules on R-rated content take effect end of December 2024 and March 2025.
Children’s Online Privacy Code: Scheduled for end of December 2026.
Digital duty of care legislation: Timeline TBD.
Whole-scale privacy reform: Timeline TBD.
Competition reform: Timeline TBD.
“This is one very small piece of an important puzzle,” Weaver said. “We need to make sure that we’re supporting young people as we take this step forward, but also calling on everyone to say this is not enough” (Sky News, December 9, 2024).
Likely effects starting December 10
Immediate deplatforming: Some under-16 users will lose access to existing accounts.
Widespread age prompts: Users of all ages may be asked to verify identity.
Platform confusion: No official exemption list exists; platforms interpret the law individually.
Support gaps: Teens who bypass restrictions may lack access to reporting tools or mental-health resources embedded in major platforms.
Bias Explanation: This piece leans Centrist/Moderate-Progressive because it centers government action (bipartisan Labor policy with cross-party support) and tech-regulation voices calling for broader systemic reforms, while highlighting individual safety and institutional transparency. Sources include the Prime Minister (center-left), a tech-policy advocate pushing for privacy/duty-of-care regulation (progressive-leaning), and no significant market-libertarian or anti-regulation voices.
Bias comparisons derive from an AI-assisted evaluation of content sources and are protected by copyright held by Mencari News. Please share any feedback to newsdesk@readmencari.com
Sustaining Mencari Requires Your Support
Independent journalism costs money. Help us continue delivering in-depth investigations and unfiltered commentary on the world's real stories. Your financial contribution enables thorough investigative work and thoughtful analysis, all supported by a dedicated community committed to accuracy and transparency.
Subscribe today to unlock our full archive of investigative reporting and fearless analysis. Subscribing to independent media outlets represents more than just information consumption—it embodies a commitment to factual reporting.
It only takes a minute to help us investigate fearlessly and expose lies and wrongdoing to hold power accountable. Thanks!