The ban serves as a protective mechanism—similar to age restrictions on driving—to give children time to mature cognitively before facing these risks. However, Dr. Ey emphasizes that the ban alone isn’t enough. Media literacy education must become as important as math and English in schools, while parents need to educate themselves about online risks, maintain open communication with their children, and reassure them that no problem is too big to solve together. The interview explores whether the ban will effectively reduce harm or simply shift risks to platforms like gaming, and discusses why education remains the most powerful long-term protection strategy.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Takeaways

• Cognitive Development Timeline Drives Policy: Children’s executive functioning skills and critical thinking abilities continue developing until around age 16-17, with peak sexual development occurring between ages 10-17, making adolescents particularly vulnerable to online risks including predatory behavior, misinformation, and content promoting self-harm or eating disorders during this crucial developmental window.

• Comprehensive Risk Landscape Beyond Cyberbullying: Social media exposure encompasses far more than bullying—risks include sextortion (perpetrators coercing sexual images then using them for control), child sexual abuse, false information shaping perceptions, conspiracy theories, body image dysphoria, addiction, depression, suicidal ideation, and access to dangerous content like bomb-making instructions or hate speech.

• Perpetrators Outpace Both Police and Children: Child sexual abuse perpetrators are sophisticated actors who remain consistently ahead of law enforcement detection methods, operating secretively and manipulating children through grooming techniques—if police struggle to identify and trap these perpetrators, expecting cognitively developing children to recognize and resist them is unrealistic without protective measures.

• Education Trumps Regulation as Long-Term Solution: While the ban provides temporary protection, Dr. Ey emphasizes that media literacy education represents a more effective long-term strategy than regulation alone, arguing it should receive equivalent priority to mathematics and English in curricula, with systematic monitoring and assessment of what children learn about recognizing and responding to online risks.

• Parental Communication Provides Critical Safety Net: Children who fall victim to online grooming or send compromising images often remain silent due to fear of consequences or punishment, sometimes resulting in tragic outcomes including suicide—parents must establish that no problem is too big to address together, creating an approachable environment where children feel safe reporting uncomfortable or suspicious online interactions immediately.

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

This interview examines Australia’s imminent social media ban for children under 16 through a conversation with Associate Professor Dr. Lesley Anne Ey, a child development expert from UniSA Education Futures. The discussion provides scientific context for the policy while exploring its practical implications and limitations.

Dr. Ey grounds the policy rationale in developmental psychology, explaining that while the internet offers tremendous opportunities for learning, connection, and entertainment, it also creates a risk environment for which children are neurologically unprepared. The adolescent brain undergoes significant development between ages 10-17, a period that coincides with both sexual maturation and the formation of executive functioning skills necessary for critical thinking and risk assessment.

The scope of online risks extends well beyond the commonly discussed cyberbullying. Dr. Ey catalogs a disturbing range of harms: sextortion schemes where perpetrators manipulate children into sending sexual images then use those images for ongoing control and abuse; direct child sexual exploitation; exposure to harmful instructional content including bomb-making guides; pornography; hate speech; misinformation campaigns; conspiracy theories deliberately designed to distort reality; content promoting negative body image and eating disorders; and platforms that facilitate addiction patterns while exacerbating depression and suicidal ideation.

Schools teach critical thinking, Dr. Ey notes, but primarily in academic contexts—problem-solving exercises and curriculum-based challenges. This educational approach doesn’t adequately prepare children to identify and respond to bad-faith actors, sophisticated manipulation tactics, or the psychological techniques employed by online predators. These perpetrators represent a particular challenge because they operate with deliberate deception and remain consistently ahead of law enforcement capabilities.

This creates what Dr. Ey characterizes as an impossible expectation: if trained police officers with specialized resources struggle to identify and apprehend child predators operating online, how can society reasonably expect cognitively developing children to recognize these same threats and protect themselves effectively?

The social media ban emerges from this analysis as a protective mechanism rather than a comprehensive solution. Dr. Ey draws an explicit parallel to driving age restrictions—society doesn’t permit children to drive until 16 not because driving is inherently wrong, but because children require time to develop the physical coordination, judgment, and risk assessment capabilities that safe driving demands. Similarly, the social media ban provides a developmental buffer period.

However, Dr. Ey repeatedly emphasizes that the ban alone represents only partial protection. Gaming platforms, text messaging, and other digital communication channels remain accessible and carry similar risks. This reality necessitates a comprehensive educational approach involving multiple stakeholders.

For parents, Dr. Ey outlines specific responsibilities: self-education about social media platforms and internet safety through resources like the eSafety Commissioner website; direct conversation with children about the reasons behind the ban and the specific risks it addresses; creating an approachable communication environment; and crucially, reassuring children that no mistake or problem is too serious to address together.

This last point receives particular emphasis. Dr. Ey explains that children who become victims of grooming or who make mistakes like sending compromising images often remain silent due to fear of parental anger or punishment. This silence allows abuse to continue and intensify. In worst-case scenarios, children overwhelmed by shame and fear have taken their own lives rather than face consequences they perceived as insurmountable. Establishing unconditional support and problem-solving partnership becomes a literal life-or-death communication priority.

Schools carry complementary responsibilities. Dr. Ey argues that media literacy education should receive equivalent curricular priority to mathematics and English. Current Australian curriculum includes these components, but without systematic monitoring, assessment, or verification that students are actually learning protective skills. This represents a fundamental pedagogical gap.

The educational approach must extend beyond traditional internet safety to encompass critical media literacy—teaching children to recognize false information, understand AI-generated content, identify manipulation tactics, and develop healthy skepticism about online interactions. Schools occupy a unique position to deliver this education systematically and universally.

When asked whether media literacy might prove more effective than regulation, Dr. Ey responds affirmatively. Teaching children to recognize and manage risk creates more durable protection than any regulatory framework. However, she qualifies this by noting that education requires time to take effect, while children face immediate risks. The ban buys time for educational interventions to work while children continue maturing.

Regarding the ban’s effectiveness in reducing cyberbullying specifically, Dr. Ey predicts mixed outcomes. Some children experiencing bullying will likely welcome the protection the ban provides by reducing harassment opportunities. However, bullying won’t disappear because alternative platforms remain accessible. The fundamental principle holds: reducing opportunity for harm represents improvement even when complete elimination isn’t achievable.

The interview addresses socioeconomic concerns about differential access creating inequality. Dr. Ey rejects this framing based on device penetration data—approximately 80% of children age eight and older possess mobile phone access, with tablets and computers providing additional access points through family devices and schools. The ubiquity of device access means essentially all children face online risks regardless of socioeconomic status. The ban therefore provides relatively equal protection across economic strata.

Throughout the conversation, Dr. Ey maintains that risk cannot be entirely eliminated. Perpetrators will adapt and migrate to unregulated platforms. Children will find ways to access restricted services. The internet’s fundamental architecture creates access opportunities that no regulatory framework can completely control.

This reality makes education paramount. Once devices enter children’s hands—which happens early and nearly universally—education about recognition, response, and reporting becomes the primary protective mechanism. Parents and schools must provide this education proactively, comprehensively, and with appropriate sophistication about the actual threats children face.

Dr. Ey predicts that as the ban implementation progresses, researchers will observe measurable reductions in online grooming incidents and cyberbullying statistics. While acknowledging the absence of pre-implementation research evidence, she anticipates the ban will demonstrate protective effects through post-implementation data analysis.

The interview concludes with Dr. Ey reiterating the central tension: regulation provides immediate but incomplete protection, while education offers more comprehensive long-term safety but requires time and consistent implementation. Effective child protection demands both approaches working in concert, with realistic expectations about what each mechanism can accomplish.

What Readers Will Learn

Child Development Science:

• How executive functioning skills develop through adolescence and why this timeline matters for online safety

• The relationship between sexual maturation (ages 10-17) and vulnerability to exploitation

• Why critical thinking taught in academic contexts doesn’t automatically transfer to social risk assessment

• Cognitive differences between adolescent and adult brains that affect decision-making and risk recognition

Comprehensive Risk Understanding:

• The full spectrum of online harms beyond cyberbullying: sextortion, grooming, harmful content, misinformation, body image issues, and mental health impacts

• How sophisticated perpetrators operate and why they consistently outpace law enforcement detection

• The psychological manipulation tactics used to control children and prevent them from seeking help

• Why gaming platforms and messaging services present similar risks to social media

Practical Parenting Strategies:

• Specific resources for parent education (eSafety Commissioner materials)

• How to create communication environments where children feel safe reporting problems

• Language and approaches for discussing online risks without creating fear or shame

• Why unconditional problem-solving partnerships can prevent tragic outcomes

• Warning signs that children may be experiencing online abuse or manipulation

Educational Policy Implications:

• Why media literacy should receive equivalent priority to core academic subjects

• The gap between curriculum inclusion and actual learning outcomes in internet safety education

• What comprehensive critical media literacy encompasses beyond basic internet safety

• How schools can systematically teach recognition of false information, AI content, and manipulation

• The distinction between academic critical thinking and applied risk assessment skills

Regulatory Framework Analysis:

• How the under-16 ban functions as a developmental buffer mechanism

• Realistic expectations about what regulation can and cannot accomplish

• Why the ban provides protection despite not eliminating all risk

• How regulatory measures interact with educational approaches for comprehensive protection

• The parallel between age restrictions on driving and social media access

Communication Skills for Difficult Conversations:

• How to discuss sextortion, grooming, and sexual abuse with children age-appropriately

• Creating reporting pathways for children experiencing uncomfortable online interactions

• Balancing protection with age-appropriate autonomy and skill development

• Reassurance techniques that encourage disclosure rather than silence

• How to respond when children have already made mistakes or been victimized

Long-Term Protection Strategies:

• Why education represents a more effective long-term solution than regulation alone

• How to balance immediate protective measures with developmental skill-building

• The role of ongoing parent education as platforms and risks evolve

• Creating family media use policies that adapt as children mature

• Preparing children for eventual unrestricted internet access through gradual skill development

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

While mainstream media serves corporate interests, you deserve the truth.

Your Mencari subscription—less than a coffee per week—powers real independent journalism. Our reporters dig into the stories powerful people desperately want buried. No corporate masters. No political handlers. Just the uncomfortable truths that matter most right now.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

This is journalism without compromise, funded directly by readers who refuse to be misled. If this reporting opened your eyes, hit Restack so others can see what they're missing.

Share MENCARI - Delivered fearless reporting to you

Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.

The speaker argues that current government policies are driving up electricity costs while failing to reduce emissions, costing taxpayers an estimated $75 billion to date with projections of over $500 billion more by 2035. The conversation examines the tension between meeting international climate commitments under the Paris Agreement and delivering affordable energy to Australian families and industries. Key policy proposals include streamlining environmental approvals for gas projects, opening new gas basins, and prioritizing energy affordability while still reducing emissions responsibly.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Takeaways

• The LNG Export Paradox: Australia ranks as the world’s second or third-largest LNG exporter due to abundant natural gas reserves, yet the country is simultaneously constructing import terminals to purchase gas back at inflated prices—a situation the speaker characterizes as nonsensical for Australian consumers and industry.

• Staggering Climate Policy Costs: Australia has already spent approximately $75 billion on emissions reduction efforts since 2005, with estimates suggesting an additional $500 billion will be required to meet the 2035 targets, even as power prices climb and emissions plateau or increase.

• Environmental Approvals as Policy Bottleneck: The current environmental approval regime is identified as a critical obstacle preventing natural gas from reaching domestic markets, with accusations that government funding for environmental activist groups actively restricts supply expansion.

• Paris Agreement Flexibility: While committed to the Paris Agreement framework, the speaker emphasizes that nationally determined contributions (NDCs) should be revised based on national interests and changing global circumstances, noting that many countries have already walked back or modified their commitments.

• Gas as Transition Fuel Strategy: Natural gas is positioned as essential infrastructure serving three critical functions—industrial manufacturing, power generation, and emissions reduction as a transition fuel—making affordable gas access fundamental to both economic competitiveness and climate objectives.

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

This interview captures a pivotal moment in Australia’s ongoing energy policy debate, recorded during a visit to the Sutherland Shire area of Sydney. The conversation reveals deep tensions between Australia’s climate commitments and the practical economic pressures facing households and industries struggling with rising energy costs.

The discussion opens with firsthand observations from a powder coating facility, where rising gas and electricity prices are creating palpable economic strain. This real-world context frames the broader policy critique that follows. The speaker establishes a fundamental argument: that current national energy objectives are “working backwards” from unachievable long-term targets, driving electricity price increases in the process.

A central paradox emerges as the interview progresses. Despite Australia’s position as a global LNG powerhouse—the world’s second or third-largest exporter—domestic gas markets face supply constraints severe enough to justify building import terminals. This scenario, the speaker suggests, represents a policy failure that defies common sense for ordinary Australians experiencing energy bill shock.

The Paris Agreement becomes a key flashpoint in the conversation. When challenged about previous statements regarding “bureaucrats in Paris,” the speaker articulates a nuanced position: commitment to the Paris framework while reserving the right to revise Australia’s nationally determined contributions based on national interest. This position is contextualized within broader international trends, noting that many nations have modified or watered down their climate commitments as circumstances evolved.

Historical comparison provides quantitative weight to the argument. The speaker notes that over the 20 years since 2005, Australia has nearly doubled its emissions reduction efforts compared to developing nations. Meeting Labor’s 2050 targets would require doubling those efforts again—at a cost the speaker deems unsustainable given current economic pressures.

The critique extends to what the speaker characterizes as policy-driven supply restrictions. Environmental approval processes are identified as creating significant delays for gas projects, with the additional claim that government funding supports environmental activist organizations working to limit gas development. This creates a feedback loop that constrains domestic supply while Australia continues exporting LNG internationally.

The proposed alternative centers on what the speaker calls “stepping on the gas”—a policy framework that would streamline approvals, open new gas basins, facilitate private sector pipeline development, and recognize natural gas’s critical role across power generation, industrial use, and manufacturing. The fundamental principle articulated is that increased supply, coupled with grid balance and affordable energy as the primary objective, would deliver better outcomes for both prices and emissions.

Throughout the interview, the speaker emphasizes a commitment to honesty with voters about policy realities and costs, contrasting this approach with what’s characterized as misleading claims from the current government. The argument frames energy affordability not as opposition to climate action, but as essential to maintaining public support for realistic emissions reduction that matches technological capabilities and international comparability.

What Readers Will Learn

Policy Analysis Skills:

• How to evaluate the real-world costs of climate policy implementation beyond headline targets

• Understanding the relationship between energy supply dynamics and electricity pricing

• Recognizing the gap between international climate commitments and domestic policy execution

Australian Energy Market Fundamentals:

• Why Australia’s position as a major LNG exporter doesn’t automatically translate to domestic energy security

• The role of natural gas in Australia’s energy transition and industrial base

• How environmental approval processes impact energy project development timelines

Climate Policy Economics:

• The financial scale of Australia’s emissions reduction efforts: $75 billion spent, $500 billion projected

• How nationally determined contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement function in practice

• Why countries revise their climate commitments and the factors driving those decisions

Political Communication Strategies:

• How policy positions are framed around “national interest” versus international agreements

• The use of concrete examples (powder coating facilities, import terminals) to illustrate abstract policy critiques

• Techniques for presenting alternative policy frameworks while maintaining climate credibility

Critical Thinking Applications:

• Evaluating claims about emissions trends (reductions under previous government vs. current flatlines)

• Understanding trade-offs between energy affordability and climate ambition

• Recognizing how supply-side interventions (or restrictions) impact market outcomes

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

While mainstream media serves corporate interests, you deserve the truth.

Your Mencari subscription—less than a coffee per week—powers real independent journalism. Our reporters dig into the stories powerful people desperately want buried. No corporate masters. No political handlers. Just the uncomfortable truths that matter most right now.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

This is journalism without compromise, funded directly by readers who refuse to be misled. If this reporting opened your eyes, hit Restack so others can see what they're missing.

Share MENCARI - Delivered fearless reporting to you

Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.

The conversation reveals how these movements use social media to spread anger and false information, particularly targeting immigrants as scapegoats for Australia's housing and cost-of-living crises. Despite organizers claiming otherwise, neo-Nazi groups actively participated in and spoke at these rallies, showing the interconnected nature of Australia's extremist ecosystem.

While the numbers weren't as large as feared, the movements are becoming more emboldened and violent, posing real security threats. The episode also explores the disturbing connections between anti-immigration sentiment and misogynistic beliefs, particularly through movements like "Tradwives" that promote both traditional gender roles and white supremacist ideologies.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Takeaways

• COVID-19 Catalyst: The sovereign citizen movement experienced significant growth in Australia following pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates, as people felt direct government intervention in their lives for the first time

• Social Media Manipulation: Far-right groups excel at using digital platforms to spread disinformation and create anger, exploiting social media algorithms that prioritize engagement over accuracy

• Scapegoating Strategy: Despite evidence that immigrants contribute positively to Australia's economy, extremist groups falsely blame them for housing shortages and economic problems to divert attention from real causes like corporate profiteering

• Neo-Nazi Integration: Despite organizers' denials, neo-Nazi leaders like Thomas Sewell actively spoke at March for Australia events, revealing coordination within Australia's far-right ecosystem

• Violence Escalation: While protest numbers were lower than expected, extremist groups are becoming increasingly emboldened and willing to engage in violence, presenting genuine security threats

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

This episode of PART 8A provides crucial insights into Australia's evolving far-right landscape through an in-depth conversation with Dr. Simon Copland, a leading researcher in online extremism at Australian National University. The discussion centers on the August 31st "March for Australia" protests, which drew an estimated 15,000 people in Adelaide alone, making it one of the largest far-right demonstrations in recent Australian history.

Dr. Copland begins by explaining the sovereign citizen movement—a pseudo-legal ideology originating in the 1970s that views governments as illegitimate unless individuals personally consent to their authority. This movement has found fertile ground in Australia since 2022, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic's lockdown measures and vaccine mandates. For many Australians, these policies represented the first significant government intervention in their daily lives, creating resentment that extremist groups successfully exploited.

The conversation reveals the sophisticated digital strategies employed by these movements. Dr. Copland explains how far-right groups leverage social media algorithms designed to maximize engagement, often through content that generates anger and outrage. This creates a feedback loop where false information about immigration, housing, and social issues spreads rapidly, reaching vulnerable individuals during times of economic distress.

A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the deliberate scapegoating of immigrants for Australia's housing and cost-of-living crises. Dr.Copland provides specific examples, including how one March for Australia organizer was connected to a major property developer holding thousands of empty properties—highlighting how those truly responsible for housing shortages deflect blame onto vulnerable communities.

The episode explores the troubling intersection of misogyny and racism within these movements, examining phenomena like the "Tradwives" movement in the United States. This reveals how anti-immigration sentiment often connects to broader ideologies promoting traditional gender roles and white supremacy, creating a comprehensive worldview that appeals to various grievances.

Despite organizers' claims of excluding extremist groups, the interview exposes clear evidence of neo-Nazi participation and leadership in these events. Thomas Sewell, leader of the National Socialist Network, not only attended but spoke at Melbourne's rally, demonstrating the porous boundaries between different extremist factions.

Dr. Copland provides crucial context by comparing Australia's situation to international trends, noting that while far-right movements haven't achieved the political success seen in the United States or Europe, concerning indicators are emerging. These include increased support for fringe parties, growing negative sentiment toward immigration in polling, and most alarmingly, increased willingness among extremist groups to engage in violence.

The episode concludes with practical guidance for monitoring these movements' evolution, emphasizing the need for continued vigilance from researchers, journalists, and policymakers to prevent Australia from following the path of radicalization seen in other Western democracies.

What Readers Will Learn

• Historical Context: Understanding of how the sovereign citizen movement developed and why it resonates in common law countries like Australia

• COVID-19 Impact: How pandemic policies inadvertently accelerated extremist recruitment by creating widespread resentment toward government authority

• Digital Manipulation Tactics: Specific strategies used by far-right groups to exploit social media algorithms and spread disinformation effectively

• Economic Scapegoating: How extremist leaders deliberately redirect anger about legitimate economic problems toward vulnerable minority groups

• Ideological Intersections: The connections between anti-immigration sentiment, misogyny, and white supremacist beliefs within modern extremist movements

• International Comparisons: How Australia's far-right landscape compares to more advanced extremist movements in the US and Europe

• Warning Signs: Key indicators that researchers and policymakers should monitor to assess whether extremist movements are gaining mainstream traction

• Security Implications: Why even small numbers of radicalized individuals pose significant threats to community safety

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

While mainstream media serves corporate interests, you deserve the truth.

Your Mencari subscription—less than a coffee per week—powers real independent journalism. Our reporters dig into the stories powerful people desperately want buried. No corporate masters. No political handlers. Just the uncomfortable truths that matter most right now.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

This is journalism without compromise, funded directly by readers who refuse to be misled. If this reporting opened your eyes, hit Restack so others can see what they're missing.

Share MENCARI - Delivered fearless reporting to you

Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.

For the first time since World War II, Australia has expelled a foreign ambassador - this time Iran's representative - following shocking revelations from ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organisation).

The intelligence agency directly linked Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to anti-Semitic attacks on Australian soil, including synagogue firebombings in Melbourne. This 17-minute deep-dive explains the unprecedented diplomatic fallout, national security implications, and what this means for Australian-Iranian relations, the Jewish community's safety, and Australia's broader Middle East policy.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Takeaways

• Historic Diplomatic Action: Australia expelled Iran's ambassador - the first such expulsion since WWII - giving them seven days to leave the country after ASIO provided concrete evidence of Iranian interference

• Terror Financing Allegations: ASIO alleges Iran directly paid Australian actors to carry out anti-Semitic attacks, including the Melbourne synagogue firebombing that created widespread fear in the Jewish community.

• IRGC Terrorist Designation: Australia will officially list Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization, a move the Conservative opposition had been demanding for years.

• Rare Foreign State Attack: Physical attacks directed by foreign nations on Australian soil are extremely uncommon, making this case particularly significant for national security agencies.

• Geopolitical Complications: This action strains Australia's complex Middle East relationships, especially as the country prepares to recognize Palestine at the UN General Assembly while maintaining security intelligence cooperation with Israel.

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

This episode delivers breaking analysis of one of Australia's most significant diplomatic moves in decades. Amy Remeikis reveals how ASIO's investigation into anti-Semitic attacks across Australia uncovered a shocking international conspiracy. What initially appeared to be lone-wolf incidents were actually coordinated attacks allegedly funded by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The conversation explores the rapid government response - within 24 hours of receiving ASIO's findings, Australia evacuated its diplomats from Iran and expelled the Iranian ambassador. Remeikis explains why this unprecedented action represents such a dramatic escalation, comparing it to Australia's continued diplomatic relations with Israel despite ongoing tensions over Gaza.

Key discussion points include the vulnerability of Australians currently in Iran, the effectiveness of listing the IRGC as a terrorist organization, and the delicate balance between addressing anti-Semitism and legitimate criticism of Israeli actions. The interview also examines how this crisis fits into Australia's broader national security strategy and its relationships with Five Eyes intelligence partners.

Remeikis provides crucial context about Australia's geographic protection, its role as a "middle player" internationally, and why foreign interference in Australian affairs is so unusual. The episode concludes with analysis of how this decision might reshape Australia's intelligence relationships and diplomatic positioning in the Middle East.

What Readers Will Learn

• The complete timeline of Australia's unprecedented diplomatic response to Iranian interference

• How ASIO investigates and responds to foreign state-sponsored attacks on Australian soil

• The legal and practical implications of listing foreign military units as terrorist organizations

• The complex relationship between anti-Semitism, criticism of Israel, and foreign interference

• Australia's unique position in Middle East geopolitics and intelligence sharing

• The challenges facing dual nationals and diaspora communities during diplomatic crises

• How geographic isolation affects Australia's national security strategy and international relations

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

While mainstream media serves corporate interests, you deserve the truth.

Your Mencari subscription—less than a coffee per week—powers real independent journalism. Our reporters dig into the stories powerful people desperately want buried. No corporate masters. No political handlers. Just the uncomfortable truths that matter most right now.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

This is journalism without compromise, funded directly by readers who refuse to be misled. If this reporting opened your eyes, hit Restack so others can see what they're missing.

Share MENCARI - Delivered fearless reporting to you

Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.

The conversation covers complex topics like Hamas, Palestinian leadership problems, and whether a two-state solution can actually work.

Dr. Kear explains these complicated international issues in a way that helps listeners understand the bigger picture of this historic policy change.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Takeaways

• Coordinated Western Response: Australia's recognition aligns with a coordinated movement by Western nations including the UK, France, and Canada, representing a significant shift away from US-controlled Middle East peace processes

• Domestic Political Controversy: Opposition leader Susan Lee criticized the decision after Hamas praised Australia's move, creating a political divide over whether recognizing Palestine legitimizes terrorist organizations

• Palestinian Leadership Crisis: Current Palestinian Authority President Mohammed Abbas faces an 80% disapproval rating, with Dr. Kear identifying imprisoned leader Marwan Barghouti as the only figure capable of uniting Palestinians democratically

• Democratic Legitimacy Debate: Western demands to exclude Hamas from future Palestinian governance conflict with democratic principles, as Hamas won legitimate elections in 2006 and remains popular among Palestinians

• Two-State Solution Skepticism: Dr. Kear expresses doubt about achieving a sovereign Palestinian state, citing Israel's permanent settlement strategy and unwillingness to withdraw from East Jerusalem

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

This episode of Part8A examines Australia's groundbreaking decision to recognize Palestinian statehood, announced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for presentation at the September 2025 UN General Assembly.

Host Miko Santos interviews Dr. Martin Kear, a specialist in Palestinian politics from the University of Sydney, to unpack the multifaceted implications of this policy shift.

The conversation begins with Dr. Kear explaining the momentum behind Australia's decision, attributing it to growing international frustration with the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the dormant Middle East peace process controlled exclusively by Israel and the United States. He emphasizes how this coordinated recognition by Western nations, particularly those with Security Council membership like France and the UK, represents an attempt to bypass traditional diplomatic channels and apply meaningful pressure on Israel.

A significant portion of the discussion addresses domestic Australian political reactions, particularly opposition criticism following Hamas's endorsement of the recognition.

Dr. Kear contextualizes Hamas's response within their broader political objectives, explaining how their October 2023 attack aimed to disrupt the normalization of Israeli occupation rather than expressing mere hatred of Israel.

The interview delves deeply into Palestinian governance challenges, highlighting the legitimacy crisis facing the Palestinian Authority under President Abbas's authoritarian leadership. Dr. Kear advocates for inclusive democratic processes that allow Hamas participation, arguing that Western exclusion of democratically elected representatives undermines Palestinian self-determination and repeats colonial patterns of imposed governance.

The discussion concludes with skeptical assessments of long-term prospects for Palestinian sovereignty, examining how Israeli settlement strategies have systematically undermined the viability of a two-state solution, while considering Australia's potential role as a middle power in future diplomatic initiatives.

What Readers Will Learn

• Geopolitical Strategy Analysis: Understanding how coordinated diplomatic recognition serves as an alternative to traditional peace process mechanisms and the strategic implications of bypassing US-controlled negotiations.

• Democratic Governance Complexities: Insights into the tension between Western security concerns and democratic legitimacy in Palestinian politics, including the challenge of excluding popular movements from governance structures.

• Middle East Policy Evolution: Comprehensive analysis of how Australia's recognition fits within broader Western policy shifts toward Palestine and the changing dynamics of international Middle East diplomacy.

• Palestinian Political Landscape: Detailed examination of Palestinian Authority leadership challenges, the role of Hamas in Palestinian politics, and the search for legitimate representation that can unite Palestinian factions.

• Two-State Solution Realities: Critical assessment of the practical obstacles to Palestinian sovereignty, including settlement expansion, Jerusalem's status, and the international community's limited leverage over Israeli policy.

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

While mainstream media serves corporate interests, you deserve the truth.

Your Mencari subscription—less than a coffee per week—powers real independent journalism. Our reporters dig into the stories powerful people desperately want buried. No corporate masters. No political handlers. Just the uncomfortable truths that matter most right now.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

This is journalism without compromise, funded directly by readers who refuse to be misled. If this reporting opened your eyes, hit Restack so others can see what they're missing.

Share MENCARI - Delivered fearless reporting to you

Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.

Think of it like this: imagine if your local mayor started making federal laws during a "city emergency." That's essentially what happened when emergency powers meant for national crises got used for everyday trade disputes. The result? A legal mess that's left businesses with million-dollar bills they can't plan for, supply chains grinding to a halt, and the entire global economy playing a waiting game that could last months.

This isn't just about economics—it's about the fundamental question of who gets to make the rules that affect what you pay for everything from your phone to your morning coffee.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Takeaways

• Constitutional Collision: Courts ruled that tariffs under emergency powers (IEPA) are illegal because only Congress, not the President, has the constitutional authority to regulate commerce—a principle dating back to "no taxation without representation"

• Massive Economic Impact: 50% tariffs on EU goods, 145% on Chinese products, and 10% on most other countries could eliminate entire trade relationships and cut US GDP by 0.8%

• Legal vs. Illegal Tariffs: While emergency tariffs face court challenges, other tariffs under Sections 201, 232, and 301 remain legal because they follow proper Congressional approval processes

• Business Paralysis: Companies are leaving goods in customs warehouses rather than paying uncertain tariffs, with one small business owner facing an unexpected $600,000 bill just to retrieve her inventory

• Global Supply Chain Redesign: International businesses are actively reconfiguring supply chains to minimize US market exposure, potentially permanently reshaping global trade patterns

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

This episode explores the unprecedented intersection of constitutional law, emergency powers, and global trade policy through the lens of Trump's controversial "Liberation Day" tariffs. Host Mikko Santos interviews Dr. Susan Stone, Credit Union SA Chair of Economics at University of South Australia, to unpack one of the most significant trade law challenges in modern history.

The conversation begins with Trump's invocation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPA)—legislation originally designed during World War I to control enemy investments and later used for sanctioning terrorist organizations and countries like Russia. Trump stretched this emergency framework to justify tariffs on 90 countries, citing the fentanyl crisis for Mexico, China, and Canada, and trade deficits for everyone else.

Dr. Stone meticulously explains the legal distinction between different types of tariffs. While emergency tariffs under IEPA face constitutional challenges, other tariffs imposed under Sections 201 (safeguard protection), 232 (national security), and 301 (unfair trade practices) remain legally sound because they follow established Congressional approval processes.

The constitutional principle at stake traces back to America's founding grievances about "taxation without representation." The courts ruled that Congress, not the President, holds authority over commerce regulation—making Trump's emergency tariff approach constitutionally problematic.

Real-world impacts emerge through vivid examples: a small business owner suddenly owing $600,000 for goods in customs, 12 states arguing tariffs impair their ability to provide public services, and businesses globally redesigning supply chains to avoid US market volatility.

The discussion reveals how legal uncertainty creates economic paralysis. With appeals potentially reaching the Supreme Court over months, businesses face impossible planning scenarios. Investment is declining across sectors, the Federal Reserve fears stagflation, and even if emergency tariffs are ruled illegal, Trump retains other legal avenues for tariff implementation.

The episode concludes by examining how trading partners worldwide are factoring judicial uncertainty into their economic planning, with countries like Canada actively diversifying away from US markets toward the EU and UK.

What Readers Will Learn

• Constitutional Law Foundations: Understanding how America's founding principles about taxation and representation directly impact modern trade policy and why separation of powers matters in global commerce.

  Trade Policy Mechanics: The difference between emergency powers (IEPA) and legitimate tariff processes (Sections 201, 232, 301), and why these distinctions determine what's legal and what's not.

  Economic Impact Assessment: How to interpret the real-world effects of trade policy uncertainty, from individual business cash flow crises to GDP-level economic projections.

  Global Supply Chain Dynamics: Why businesses are permanently restructuring international operations and what this means for future trade relationships and consumer prices.

  Legal Risk Management: How judicial uncertainty affects business decision-making and why companies are choosing supply chain diversification over waiting for court resolutions.

  Investment Strategy Implications: Understanding how trade policy volatility influences market performance, with the US stock market underperforming globally due to tariff uncertainty.

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

While mainstream media serves corporate interests, you deserve the truth.

Your Podwires subscription—less than a coffee per week—powers real independent journalism. Our reporters dig into the stories powerful people desperately want buried. No corporate masters. No political handlers. Just the uncomfortable truths that matter most right now.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

This is journalism without compromise, funded directly by readers who refuse to be misled. If this reporting opened your eyes, hit Restack so others can see what they're missing.

Share MENCARI - Delivered fearless reporting to you

Not ready to be paid subscribe, but appreciate the newsletter ? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.

Dr. Carwyn Jones from Victoria University explains how this bill threatened to overturn 50 years of constitutional development, why it sparked the largest protest march in New Zealand history, and what happened when Māori MPs performed a haka in Parliament.

The discussion reveals fundamental tensions between formal equality and indigenous rights that extend far beyond New Zealand's borders.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Takeaways

• Constitutional Revolution Reversed: The Treaty Principles Bill would have dismantled 50 years of judicial interpretation that built partnership between Māori and the government, forcing a restart of constitutional understanding

• Coalition Politics Exposed: The unusual arrangement where coalition partners publicly opposed their junior partner's flagship legislation reveals the fragility of ideologically diverse political partnerships

• Cultural Expression vs Parliamentary Order: The 21-day suspension recommended for Māori MPs who performed a haka represents the longest parliamentary punishment in New Zealand history, seven times previous maximums

• International Indigenous Rights Impact: The controversy damaged New Zealand's global reputation as a leader in indigenous rights, with indigenous peoples worldwide watching the rollback with concern

• Overwhelming Public Opposition: Nearly 300,000 submissions and the largest protest march in New Zealand history demonstrated broad public rejection of the bill, not just from Māori but across all communities

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

Constitutional Framework and Historical Context

Dr. Jones explains how the Waitangi Tribunal, established in 1975, has spent five decades interpreting Treaty of Waitangi principles without rigid definitions. This evolutionary approach allowed for contextual application considering both Māori and English treaty texts, building established principles around partnership and active protection. The proposed bill would have eliminated this nuanced framework in favor of rigid, formalistic interpretations.

The Equality Debate: Form vs Substance

The episode explores the fundamental philosophical divide between the ACT Party's formalistic "everyone treated the same" approach and the substantive equality that addresses historical injustices and ongoing disparities. Dr. Jones demonstrates how Māori face consistently worse health outcomes across all socioeconomic groups, requiring targeted policy responses rather than identical treatment.

Coalition Governance Mechanics

The analysis reveals how proportional representation systems handle ideological diversity within coalitions. The National Party's agreement to support the bill through first reading while opposing its passage created an unusual dynamic that allowed divisive legislation to gain legitimacy without commitment to implementation.

Parliamentary Procedure vs Cultural Expression

The haka incident represents a collision between Westminster parliamentary traditions and indigenous cultural expression. The Privileges Committee's refusal to hear expert testimony on Māori cultural practices and their recommendation of unprecedented suspension lengths highlights institutional barriers to cultural understanding.

International Implications and Indigenous Solidarity

The discussion extends beyond New Zealand to examine how indigenous communities globally view the rollback of rights. The viral nature of the parliamentary haka footage amplified international attention to indigenous rights fragility in settler societies.

What Readers Will Learn

• Constitutional Law Enthusiasts will understand how unwritten constitutional principles develop through judicial interpretation and the risks of legislative override of evolutionary constitutional development.

• Political Science Students gain insights into coalition management, the balance between formal democratic procedures and cultural authenticity, and how proportional representation systems handle ideological diversity.

• Indigenous Rights Advocates learn about the vulnerability of rights not protected by formal constitutional entrenchment and strategies for building broad-based opposition to regressive legislation.

• International Observers discover how settler societies grapple with decolonization tensions and the global implications of indigenous rights setbacks in progressive nations.

• General Audiences receive accessible explanations of complex constitutional issues and their practical impacts on everyday governance and social equity.

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.

Dr. Daniel Fazio from UniSA Justice and Society provides expert analysis on this historic breakup that has only happened three times in over a century.

The discussion covers the immediate causes of the split, including disagreements over nuclear power, regional Australia future funds, and supermarket divestiture powers, while examining the potential long-term consequences for Australian politics and what might bring these parties back together in the future.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Bullet Points

• The National-Liberal Party coalition split follows decades of partnership, with Dr. Fasio noting there were warning signs but the final step was still somewhat surprising.

• Historical context shows this has only happened three times in over a century, with previous breakups in 1941 and 1987, but the parties eventually reunited for electoral viability.

• Key issues driving the split include nuclear power policy, regional funds, and supermarket competition, all connected by demographic shifts following recent election results.

• Neither party can realistically win government alone - the Liberal Party has only won enough seats to govern in its own right three times in Australian political history.

• The split potentially benefits Labor in the short term by allowing them to claim they represent all of Australia while facing a fragmented opposition, though it creates concerning implications for democratic accountability.

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

The Part 8A podcast delivers an insightful interview with Dr. Daniel Fazio of UniSA Justice and Society discussing the recent split between the National and Liberal Party in Australia. While there had been warning signs with senior members from both parties suggesting a split might be best, Dr. Fazio admits the final decision still came as somewhat of a surprise.

Dr. Fazio places this significant political event in historical context, noting this has only happened three times in over a century. He references the notable 1941 split when the United Australia Party (predecessor to the Liberal Party) separated from the Country Party, before Robert Menzies founded the modern Liberal Party in 1944 and reunited them in coalition by 1949. Another split occurred in 1987 when Queensland Premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen launched his campaign for Prime Minister, though this split was state-based and temporary.

The political reality, as Dr. Fazio explains, comes down to demographics and electoral math. The Liberal Party has only managed to win enough seats to govern in its own right three times in Australian political history (1975, 1977, and 1996). Every other conservative government formation has required both parties working together.

The discussion explores what specifically caused this coalition breakdown. Dr. Fazio attributes equal weight to policy disagreements over nuclear power, regional Australia future funds, and supermarket divestiture powers. However, he connects these issues to shifting demographics revealed in recent election results - the National Party held almost all their seats while the Liberal Party suffered heavy losses in urban areas, creating a more equal parliamentary representation between the parties and giving Nationals more political clout.

On the nuclear power issue specifically, Dr. Fazio identifies it as the policy creating the greatest tension between the parties. The National Party strongly supports nuclear power, regional Liberals have been lukewarm, and urban Liberals' support has been "problematic to say the least."

Regarding supermarket competition, Dr. Fazio explains this issue directly impacts National Party constituents in regional Australia, where major supermarket chains have eliminated competition from smaller players, resulting in less price competition and higher costs for rural communities. This represents a core cost-of-living concern for the National Party's base.

The repeated emphasis on "principle" by National Party leaders reflects both consistency in their policy positions and strategic political calculation. Dr. Fasio suggests this serves to solidify their support base in regional Australia while distancing themselves from the Liberal Party's electoral challenges. This separation allows them to focus entirely on representing their constituents without compromise.

Looking at future electoral prospects, Dr. Fazio considers it "extremely, extremely unlikely" the National Party could win government alone, and even the Liberal Party would find it "very, very difficult" based on historical precedent and current demographics. This suggests the parties will eventually need to reunite, though the timeline remains uncertain.

For reconciliation to occur, Dr. Fasio believes both parties would need to resolve the urban-rural-regional divide and reach agreement on energy policy at minimum. He suggests future electoral defeats might ultimately motivate both sides toward compromise, though in the short term they're likely to stake out distinct positions to maintain their respective bases.

From Labor's perspective, Dr. Fazio sees advantages in the split, allowing them to position themselves as the united party representing all of Australia against a fragmented opposition. This fragmentation makes it harder for conservatives to present a unified alternative government, though Labor must guard against complacency.

Dr. Fazio also raises concerns about democratic accountability, noting the importance of a strong opposition in Australia's parliamentary system. With the National Party no longer part of the formal opposition, government scrutiny becomes more fragmented and potentially less effective.

In parliamentary dynamics, the split creates new possibilities in the Senate, where Labor now has more negotiating options for passing legislation - potentially working with Greens on some initiatives and Nationals on rural and regional matters.

Dr. Fazio concludes by suggesting that while the parties may reunite in the future, it will likely be under different terms - "a new coalition" rather than recreating the old relationship, especially the longer they remain apart.

What Readers Will Learn

From this episode, listeners will gain insights into:

1. The historical significance of the National-Liberal Party coalition split in Australian politics

2. The specific policy disagreements that triggered the breakup, particularly around energy and regional issues

3. How electoral demographics influence party strategy and coalition dynamics

4. The practical limitations preventing either conservative party from winning government alone

5. Potential scenarios for coalition reformation and what conditions would be necessary

6. How this split affects parliamentary operations, particularly in the Senate

7. The implications for democratic accountability in Australia's political system

8. Strategic advantages this creates for the Labor government

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.

La Trobe University researcher Finley Watson explains how these fake podcasts work, why brands pay big money for them, and how they're being used to influence political opinions. He also discusses how social media has changed the way Australians get their news, with many people now trusting influencers more than traditional newspapers and TV.

The conversation covers practical tips for spotting fake content and emphasizes the importance of getting news from multiple, reliable sources rather than just social media.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Five Key Bullet Points

• Fake podcasts are big business - Actors can earn up to $16,000 monthly creating fake podcast clips that mimic real interview formats to sell products or push political agendas

• Social media dominates news consumption - One in five Americans get news from social media regularly, rising to one in three for those under 30, making platforms like TikTok crucial for political influence

• Three types of political influencers - Professional full-time influencers, politically-affiliated personalities with broader interests, and amateur content creators, with affiliated influencers having the most election impact

• Traditional media adapts rather than disappears - Legacy media companies successfully redistribute content on TikTok and YouTube, often getting higher viewership than individual influencers

• Media literacy requires balanced consumption - Experts recommend diversifying news sources beyond just influencers, including mainstream media, fact-checkers, and non-profit organizations

  ---

Detailed Synopsis

The Fake Podcast Phenomenon

The episode opens with Watson defining fake podcasts as a peculiar social media marketing trend where users or companies create short clips that appear to be excerpts from longer podcast interviews. These productions feature someone pretending to be an expert guest being interviewed, though no actual podcast exists. The trend extends to deepfake technology, with high-profile examples using Joe Rogan's likeness and voice for product sales and ideological promotion.

Economic Drivers Behind Fake Content

Watson explains the lucrative nature of this deception, with some actors earning up to $16,000 monthly. The success stems from podcasts' high trustworthiness rating compared to traditional advertising. Audiences develop closer bonds with podcast hosts, making the format particularly effective for marketing. Brands exploit this trust by creating shorter fake podcast clips, cutting out expensive partnerships with real podcasters while maintaining the credibility associated with the podcast format.

Political Influence Categories

The discussion shifts to Australian politics, where Watson identifies three distinct types of political influencers. Professional influencers focus entirely on political content and typically appear on YouTube, attracting male audiences interested in longer-form international content. Affiliated influencers, who have broader interests beyond politics, dominate TikTok and proved most crucial during election campaigns due to their wider appeal. Amateur influencers, while generating some controversy regarding potential political party payments, remain the least impactful group.

The Hybrid Media Ecosystem

Watson challenges the narrative of traditional media decline, instead describing a hybrid ecosystem where mainstream sources successfully adapt to new platforms. Major media companies, including the ABC and News Corp, often achieve higher viewership on TikTok and YouTube than individual influencers by redistributing existing television and print content. This suggests a migration of medium rather than a fundamental shift from institutional to individual content creators.

Detecting Misinformation

Addressing practical concerns, Watson acknowledges the difficulty of spotting fake content, especially as AI and deepfake technology advance. He emphasizes that misinformation isn't always completely false but may involve deceptive formatting alongside factual inaccuracies. Viewers must scrutinize both claims and presentation format, relying on mainstream sources and fact-checking services for verification.

Media Literacy Recommendations

The conversation concludes with Watson advocating for a "balanced media diet." While influencers can highlight overlooked issues and engage younger audiences in politics, they shouldn't be the sole news source. Young people particularly need exposure to diverse information sources, including mainstream media and non-profit organizations, while remaining vigilant about AI-generated content and potential influencer biases.

Future Electoral Implications

Looking ahead, Watson predicts future Australian elections will center on social media ecosystems, influenced by trends from the 2024 US presidential race where both parties extensively courted media personalities. However, he remains uncertain whether this necessarily favors new media figures over adapted traditional sources. The key factor will be whether elections continue to be decided within this new media landscape, potentially leading to greater influencer integration in political campaigns.

What Readers Will Learn

Readers will gain comprehensive understanding of:

• How fake podcast content operates and generates significant revenue

• The three categories of political influencers and their relative impact

• Why podcasts have become such trusted and effective marketing vehicles

• How traditional media successfully adapts to new social platforms

• Practical strategies for identifying misinformation and fake content

• The importance of diversifying news sources in the digital age

• Current trends in political campaigning through social media

• The evolution of Australia's media landscape and its electoral implications

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.

Truth matters. Quality journalism costs.

Your subscription to Mencari directly funds the investigative reporting our democracy needs. For less than a coffee per week, you enable our journalists to uncover stories that powerful interests would rather keep hidden. No corporate influence. No compromises. Just honest journalism when we need it most.

BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER

Political Analysis: Australia's Evolving Domestic and Regional Posture

The recent developments in Australian politics reflect significant strategic continuity in foreign engagement coupled with noteworthy domestic political realignments. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's immediate post-election visit to Indonesia demonstrates the Albanese government's consistent prioritization of regional partnerships, particularly with Southeast Asia's largest economy.

Regional Engagement Strategy

Albanese's Jakarta visit represents his fourth as Prime Minister, underscoring a deliberate policy architecture centered on Indonesia as Australia's most crucial bilateral relationship. The visit occurs against a complex geopolitical backdrop, with Indonesia's recent BRICS membership and questions about Russian influence generating strategic challenges for Australian policymakers. Notably, the Prime Minister's support for Indonesia's accession to both the OECD and CPTPP indicates Australia's commitment to integrating Indonesia into multilateral economic frameworks favorable to Australian interests.

Parliamentary Reconfiguration

The Australian Greens' leadership transition to Senator Larissa Waters introduces a significant variable into the parliamentary equation. Waters' explicit framing of Labor's legislative pathway as a binary choice between Greens or Coalition cooperation reflects the numerical reality in the Senate where Labor lacks an outright majority. This parliamentary mathematics creates potential leverage for the Greens on progressive policy priorities including climate action, housing affordability, and cost of living measures.

Internal Labor Dynamics

Beneath the surface of electoral success, Labor's post-election cabinet reshuffle has exposed continuing factional fault lines. The public characterization of Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles as a "factional assassin" by former Industry Minister Ed Husic reveals the tension between factional considerations and ministerial appointments. Marles' refusal to engage directly with these allegations while emphasizing "collective processes" highlights the delicate balancing act within Labor's internal governance structures.

Strategic Outlook

As the Albanese government navigates its second term, its success will depend on effectively managing these overlapping challenges: maintaining momentum in regional relationships, particularly as Indonesia potentially emerges as the world's fifth-largest economy; negotiating the parliamentary arithmetic to secure legislative outcomes; and maintaining internal party cohesion amid persistent factional dynamics.

The political landscape in mid-2025 thus presents both continuity and adaptation as defining features of Australia's domestic politics and regional engagement strategy.

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit Readmencari.com

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower. You can empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this enlightening episode of Part 8A Podcast, host Miko Santos interviews Dr. Fernanda Penaloza, Senior Lecturer in Latin American Studies at the University of Sydney, about Pope Francis' journey from the streets of Buenos Aires to global leadership.

Dr. Penaloza provides valuable insights into how Francis' Argentine roots and experiences with poverty shaped his papal mission, his intellectual relationship with Jorge Luis Borges, and his commitment to social justice and interfaith dialogue.

The conversation explores the tensions between his progressive stances on economic inequality and traditional Catholic doctrines on social issues, while examining his unique diplomatic efforts on the global stage.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• Pope Francis' commitment to the "theology of the people" differs from broader liberation theology by avoiding Marxist ideology while still advocating for social justice.

• As a young priest, Jorge Bergoglio formed an unexpected intellectual relationship with agnostic writer Jorge Luis Borges, showing his early commitment to building bridges across ideological differences.

• Francis maintained a humble lifestyle as Archbishop, refusing luxury and using public transportation while working directly with marginalized communities in Buenos Aires.

• His leadership combines three distinct identities: priest (adhering to Catholic doctrine), Jesuit (intellectual and somewhat rebellious), and Latin American (shaped by regional economic struggles).

• Dr. Penaloza suggests Francis' most enduring legacy may be his symbolic global voice for peace, particularly regarding conflicts like those in Palestine and Israel.

Read more

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower. You can empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this insightful episode of "The Expert Interview," host Miko Santos speaks with Luke Dean, an Associate Lecturer at Monash University School of Social Science and PhD candidate specializing in youth political engagement.

With Australia's federal election approaching on May 3rd, Luke offers valuable perspectives on young Australians' political participation, the challenges they face, and how the political landscape is evolving as Gen Z and Millennials become the dominant voting bloc. The conversation explores issues from social media's impact on political discourse to strategies for increasing youth representation in political office.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• Shifting Political Landscape: 2025 marks the first federal election where Gen Z and Millennials will outnumber Baby Boomers in the electorate, creating significant potential for political change.

• Disconnection from Major Parties: Young Australians are increasingly disengaged from the two major political parties, with first-preference voting for these parties at historic lows among youth.

• Social Media's Double-Edged Sword: While digital platforms increase youth political awareness, reduced moderation has led to concerning levels of misinformation during election cycles.

• Financial Barriers: The prohibitive costs of running for office and insufficient remuneration, particularly at the local government level, prevent many young people from pursuing political careers.

• Compulsory Voting Advantage: Australia's mandatory voting system results in significantly higher youth participation (70-95%) compared to voluntary systems in other democracies (40-50%).

🎙️ ABOUT OUR EXPERT

Currently working as a teaching associate with Monash University. Delivering a unit which focusses upon the Australian political system. The unit explores the government and politics of the Australian liberal democratic state.

It undertakes study of Australia's approach to Westminster governance, the development of the national constitution, the institutions of national government, federal-state relations, the political struggle that occurs between labour and capital to exert influence over the process of government, and the form and nature of Australia's system of representative democracy

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Associate Lecturer Luke Dean through Linkedin or ResearchGate

Detailed Synopsis

The episode begins with host Miko Santos introducing Luke Dean, whose research focuses on young people's political participation and representation. With Australia's federal election set for May 3rd, the timing of this conversation is particularly relevant.

Luke explains that while young Australians are highly engaged with political issues like housing affordability, climate change, and economic inequality, they feel disconnected from formal political processes. This disconnection stems from a perception that politicians and major parties are either unwilling or unable to address their concerns effectively.

The discussion highlights a significant demographic shift: 2025 will be the first election where Gen Z and Millennials collectively outnumber Baby Boomers in the electorate. Despite this growing electoral power, young voters are increasingly abandoning the two major parties in favor of minor parties, independents, and the Greens.

Luke emphasizes that young voters are not a monolithic group but share concerns about several key issues: housing affordability, precarious employment conditions, and climate change. He notes that political parties have largely failed to develop policies specifically addressing young Australians' needs during election cycles.

The conversation explores social media's transformative role in political engagement. As young people rarely consume traditional media, social platforms have become their primary source of political information and engagement. However, Luke warns that recent reductions in content moderation have led to increased misinformation and disinformation, particularly during election periods.

Luke identifies several barriers preventing young people from pursuing political office: cultural expectations about who can be a politician, financial constraints of campaigning, and inadequate remuneration (particularly at the local government level where councillors receive only about $20,000 annually). These factors contribute to the stark statistic that only 3% of Australian politicians across all levels of government were under 30 when elected.

The interview highlights the substantial positive impact of Australia's compulsory voting system, which results in 71-72% voter participation among 18-21 year-olds, rising to 90-95% for those 25 and older. This compares favorably to voluntary systems in countries like the UK and US, where youth turnout hovers around 40-50%.

Looking to the future, Luke predicts that without significant reform, young Australians will continue moving away from the two-party system toward minor parties. He anticipates more challenging political conversations about long-neglected issues like climate change, wealth inequality, and housing affordability.

The episode concludes with Luke calling for meaningful political engagement with young Australians beyond tokenistic policies, warning that failure to do so could lead to more extreme political movements similar to trends seen internationally.

What Readers Will Learn

• The current state of youth political engagement in Australia ahead of the 2025 federal election

• How Gen Z and Millennial voters differ from older demographics in their political concerns

• The impact of social media and digital platforms on young voters' political perspectives

• Barriers preventing young Australians from participating in politics as voters and candidates

• Effective strategies to increase youth political representation and engagement

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on Mencari

• 5 - Minute recap - for nightly bite-sized news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• The Expert Interview - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• Viewpoint 360 - An analysis view based on evidence, produced in collaboration with 360Info

• Mencari Banking - Get the latest banking news and financials across Australia and New Zealand

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower. You can empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this timely episode of Expert Interview, host Miko Santos and Professor Robert Brooks from Monash Business School discuss the implications of President Trump's newly imposed tariffs on Australian exports.

The conversation explores how these trade restrictions, while having minimal direct impact on Australia's overall economy, could trigger significant indirect effects through global market reactions, impact on Asian economies, and potential US inflation.

Professor Brooks explains that Australia should focus on market diversification rather than retaliatory measures, highlighting lessons from historical trade wars like the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s. The discussion also covers Australia's biosecurity standards, which Trump cited as justification for the tariffs, and examines potential strategies for Australian agribusinesses to adapt to these new trade barriers.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• The direct economic impact on Australia may be minimal, but indirect effects through global market reactions, Asian economic impacts, and US inflation could be significant.

• Historical precedent from the 1930s Smoot-Hawley tariffs suggests trade wars can dramatically reduce global trade volume and economic growth.

• Australian biosecurity measures, cited by Trump as justification for tariffs, remain non-negotiable despite pressure, with bipartisan political support.

• Market diversification, rather than retaliatory tariffs, represents Australia's most strategic response to maintain economic stability.

• US consumers, not Australian producers, will ultimately bear the cost of these tariffs through higher prices on imported goods.

🎙️ ABOUT OUR EXPERT

Rob is a Professor in the Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics and Deputy Dean, Education.

Rob obtained his honours and PhD degrees from Monash University and has previously worked at RMIT University.

His primary area of research interest is in financial econometrics, with a particular focus on beta risk estimation, volatility modelling and the analysis of the impacts of sovereign credit rating changes on financial markets. His research in the financial econometrics area has produced a number of publications in top-tier journals, along with research funding from ARC Discovery and ARC Linkage and industry sources.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Prof. Robert Brooks through Monash Business School

Detailed Synopsis

The episode begins with host Miko Santos introducing the context of President Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign imports, focusing specifically on their impact on Australian exports. Professor Robert Brooks, an econometrics and business statistics expert from Monash Business School, joins as the featured guest to provide economic analysis.

Professor Brooks first establishes that while the direct impact on Australia's overall economy may be minimal, three key indirect effects warrant serious consideration: potential retaliatory measures from other countries creating a trade war scenario, significant impacts on Asian economies that are crucial trading partners for Australia, and effects on US inflation and economic growth that could ripple through global markets.

When asked about historical precedents, Brooks references the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s, which triggered retaliatory measures that decimated US trade by nearly two-thirds and exacerbated the Great Depression. He notes that current responses seem mixed between countries threatening retaliation and others seeking alternative markets.

The discussion then shifts to Australia's strategic response, with Brooks endorsing Prime Minister Albanese's approach of seeking market diversification, particularly in the Middle East. He emphasizes that Australian agricultural products, especially beef, should continue leveraging their premium quality positioning to access new markets, though acknowledging short-term challenges.

A significant portion of the conversation addresses Australia's strict biosecurity measures, which Trump specifically mentioned as justification for the tariffs on Australian beef. Brooks strongly asserts that these measures are non-negotiable for protecting Australia's agricultural sector and environment, noting the bipartisan political support for this position.

The interview explores China's role in these trade tensions, with Brooks explaining that China's economic growth remains crucial for Australia regardless of US-China trade dynamics. He advises against retaliatory tariffs, noting they would only harm Australian consumers, and instead recommends focusing on advocacy for free trade, especially with Europe and Asia.

The conversation concludes with Brooks suggesting that Australia should strengthen trade relationships with the EU and Asian markets to reduce dependency on any single country. He emphasizes that Australia must continue its long tradition of advocating for liberalized trade while providing targeted support to affected industries during this transition period.

What Readers Will Learn

• The difference between direct and indirect economic impacts of international tariffs

• Historical lessons from past trade wars and their relevance to current global tensions

• Why retaliatory tariffs often harm the implementing country's consumers

• The strategic importance of market diversification for export-dependent economies

• How biosecurity measures function both as protection and potential trade friction points

• The complex relationship between trade balances, capital markets, and economic growth

• Practical policy approaches for navigating international trade tensions

• Economic modeling techniques for forecasting tariff impacts across different sectors

• Australia's potential role in advocating for free trade on the global stage

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on Mencari

• 5 - Minute recap - for nightly bite-sized news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• The Expert Interview - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• Viewpoint 360 - An analysis view based on evidence, produced in collaboration with 360Info

• Mencari Banking - Get the latest banking news and financials across Australia and New Zealand

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower. You can empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this hard-hitting analysis of Australia's 2025-2026 federal budget, host Miko Santos interviews distinguished economist Professor Gigi Foster from the University of New South Wales who delivers a brutally honest assessment that cuts through political rhetoric.

Professor Foster characterizes the budget as election-year political theater rather than meaningful economic reform, dissecting everything from tax cuts to energy policy, housing affordability, and healthcare funding with precise economic reasoning that challenges both government and opposition narratives.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• Professor Foster characterizes the budget as politically motivated rather than addressing structural economic problems, describing the tax cuts as minimal—"a cup of coffee a week"—while failing to target corporate tax evasion and wealth inequality.

• On energy policy, Foster strongly supports the opposition's gas reservation plan and fuel excise cut, arguing that Australia's abundant natural resources should be leveraged to reduce costs throughout the economy rather than focusing on premature green energy transitions.

• Foster challenges the notion that environmental protection conflicts with economic development, stating that wealthier countries historically take better care of their environments, suggesting economic growth and environmental stewardship can be complementary.

• The housing crisis requires multiple simultaneous solutions according to Foster, including reduced immigration in certain categories, increased housing construction, inheritance taxes on large estates, and reforms to the superannuation system to help younger Australians access housing earlier.

• Despite government claims about inflation improvement, Foster warns about mounting national debt and its implications, explaining that debt accumulated without productivity-enhancing investments will crowd out essential future spending.

🎙️ ABOUT OUR EXPERT

Professor Gigi Foster is a distinguished economist from the University of New South Wales specializing in economic policy, labor markets, and public finance. She has published extensively on Australian economic issues and is a regular commentator on budget matters and fiscal policy. Her analysis brings academic rigor and practical insight to complex economic debates.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Prof. Gigi Foster through Linkedin or UNSW website

Detailed Synopsis

The episode begins with Miko Santos introducing Professor Gigi Foster, a distinguished economist from the University of New South Wales known for her insightful analysis of economic policy. The conversation immediately addresses Treasurer Chalmers' claim that Australia is "turning the corner together" with this budget, which Professor Foster firmly rejects.

Foster characterizes the 2025-2026 federal budget as typical pre-election political maneuvering rather than substantive economic reform. She criticizes the budget for offering minor handouts—energy rebates and modest tax adjustments—without addressing fundamental structural issues in Australia's economy, society, health, or education systems. Foster suggests that many Australians lack the economic literacy to recognize these shortcomings, making such politically-motivated budgets effective despite their limitations.

When discussing the government's inflation forecasts, Foster expresses skepticism, noting that while inflation may be trending downward, the budget presentation was overoptimistic and failed to address more significant issues such as productivity decline, corporate tax evasion, and rising wealth inequality. She characterizes the income tax cuts as minimal—"a cup of coffee a week"—and explains that bracket creep during inflation will offset many of these benefits. Foster argues that addressing the receding tax base requires tackling corporate tax avoidance rather than adjusting income tax rates.

The conversation shifts to comparing alternative approaches to cost-of-living relief. Foster strongly supports the opposition's proposal to cut fuel excise for 12 months, explaining that such a measure would reduce costs throughout the economy by lowering transportation expenses for all goods, not just fuel purchases for consumers. She characterizes this as a non-inflationary approach to easing cost-of-living pressures.

On international economic challenges, Foster acknowledges Australia's vulnerability to global headwinds but emphasizes the country's fortunate position as a resource-rich nation. She identifies iron ore prices and China's economic health as crucial factors for Australia's economic wellbeing, suggesting that diversification beyond primary industries would strengthen Australia's resilience.

The discussion on energy policy reveals Foster's strong support for the opposition's national gas plan with East Coast Gas Reservation. She argues that Australia's abundant natural gas resources should be utilized more effectively to reduce energy costs rather than pursuing what she characterizes as premature transitions to renewable energy. Foster challenges the narrative that environmental protection conflicts with economic development, stating that wealthier countries historically take better care of their environments.

Regarding healthcare investment, Foster acknowledges the importance of the government's focus on general practitioners but argues that broader healthcare system reform is necessary. She emphasizes that despite increasing healthcare expenditure, Australians are experiencing declining health outcomes, suggesting fundamental failures in the health policy domain.

On the housing crisis, Foster advocates for a multipronged approach: reducing certain categories of immigration, building more public housing, reforming the superannuation system to give young people earlier access to their money, implementing inheritance taxes on large estates, and creating incentives for better utilization of existing housing stock.

The interview concludes with Foster expressing concern about the growing national debt, explaining that debt accumulated without productivity-enhancing investments will ultimately crowd out essential future spending. She suggests that neither major party is adequately addressing Australia's fundamental economic challenges and encourages voters to consider independent candidates with more comprehensive policy platforms.

What Readers Will Learn

• An economist's critical assessment of the 2025-2026 federal budget beyond political rhetoric

• The economic implications of proposed tax cuts and their actual impact on average households

• How energy policy choices affect both cost of living and environmental outcomes

• The complex interplay between immigration, housing policy, and affordability

• Why traditional budget metrics like GDP and inflation forecasts may not reflect economic realities

• The long-term consequences of government debt accumulation without productivity growth

• Alternative policy approaches to address Australia's structural economic challenges

• How to evaluate competing economic narratives from government and opposition

• The economic trade-offs between short-term relief measures and long-term structural reform

• Why economic growth and environmental protection can be complementary rather than conflicting goals

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on Mencari

• 5 - Minute recap - for nightly bite-sized news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• The Expert Interview - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• Viewpoint 360 - An analysis view based on evidence, produced in collaboration with 360Info

• Mencari Banking - Get the latest banking news and financials across Australia and New Zealand

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower. You can empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

Host Miko Santos asks Managing Director of MediaNet Amrita Sidhu in this enlightening Santos Unfiltered episode about the just-published 2025 Australian Media Landscape Report.

The thorough poll of 521 reporters exposes important patterns influencing Australia's media landscape: a worrying 67% drop in trust, increasing influence of artificial intelligence on employment security, and ongoing gender pay inequality.

Press releases remain, for 83% of reporters, a vital source of information despite obstacles. With pragmatic advice for media workers and communicators, the conversation looks at how changing social media platforms, economic pressures, and false information are reshaping the journalistic scene.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over Twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/audio. A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

1. Trust in Media Declining: 67% of journalists reported a decrease in public trust, with misinformation and fake news identified as the biggest threat to public interest journalism by 75% of respondents.

2. AI Concerns Widespread: 88% of journalists expressed concern about AI's impact on journalistic integrity, with 60% reporting they or someone they know has lost work due to AI implementation.

3. Social Media Landscape Shifting: Twitter/X usage among journalists dropped 10% between 2023 and 2024, while BlueSky achieved 19% adoption in just one year. Facebook remains the most used platform despite misinformation concerns.

4. Economic Pressures Persist: Money was cited as journalists' top challenge for the third consecutive year, with 67% feeling underpaid while being required to produce content across multiple platforms.

5. Gender Pay Gap Continues: 38% of male journalists earn $100,000+ compared to only 23% of female journalists, highlighting ongoing industry disparities.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Amrita Sidhu through Linkedin

• Download the 2025 Australian Media Landscape Report

Detailed Synopsis

Miko Santos first welcomes Amrita Sidhu, Managing Director of MediaNet, to talk on the 2025 Australian Media Landscape Report, which polled 521 reporters from several media outlets.

MediaNet has performed this yearly study for six to seven years, Sidhu says, to honour the journalistic community and inform PR and communications professionals about the opportunities and difficulties confronting people employed at the "news media coalface." The objective is to produce thought leadership that strengthens ties between media professionals and public relations communicators.

The discussion soon veers to the alarming 67% drop in confidence recorded by reporters. Sidhu names media fragmentation and the spread of false information as among the numerous contributing elements. She draws attention to a contradictory relationship with social media: while 60% of reporters claim these same platforms produce fake news and misinformation, 70% of them use social media as a story source.

According to Santos, the main threat to public interest journalism is 75% of reporters pointing out false information and fake news. The conversation then turns to the notable 10% decline in Twitter/X consumption among reporters during 2023–2024. Sidhu notes that a fast adoption of BlueSky (16–17%) has offset this drop, implying reporters still need a social network for both content creation and sourcing. She links Twitter's fall to deteriorating trust, therefore indirectly mentioning Elon Musk's impact without openly criticising him.

Ms. Sidhu addresses the impact of artificial intelligence by outlining a "paradoxical" scenario whereby 67% of reporters are not really using it yet 88% of them express worry about how it may affect journalistic integrity. She says this points more towards "fear of the unknown" than towards actual AI tool knowledge. Sidhu notes comments from polled reporters to underline how fundamentally media depends on human creativity and intellectual processes that artificial intelligence cannot replace.

The discussion then looks at job losses connected to artificial intelligence; 60% of reporters say they or someone they know has lost employment because of AI. Sidhu points to developing needs like improved fact-checking abilities that will change as artificial intelligence integration proceeds, clarifying that this often reflects a change in roles rather than total job elimination.

Regarding social media channels, despite worries about false information, Facebook is still the most often utilised medium among reporters. Sidhu points out that the poll was carried out in January; maybe before Meta's decision to eliminate some fact-checking tools could have a full effect. She projects BlueSky's use will keep rising all year long.

Regarding financial difficulties, Santos notes that for three straight years, money has been listed as the main concern for reporters and relates his own experience using Substack for extra revenue.

Sidhu says 67% of reporters feel underpaid in 2024, mostly due to more work across several platforms without matching pay raises. While 46% of reporters utilising alternative platforms like Substack seek more editorial flexibility, 53% of them do so mostly for financial reasons.

With statistics indicating 38% of male reporters earning $100,000+ compared to just 23% of female reporters, the conversation also covers the gender pay gap. Sidhu underlines that solving this discrepancy calls for action at the top leadership level of media organisations and expresses dismay that it continues year after year.

Sidhu says she wants to think the 72% of journalists who say their reporting is free from prejudice is accurate, even if she admits some degree of bias is unavoidable in all kinds of content creation.

Sidhu's reflections on how the social media terrain might change for reporters by 2026 wrap up the interview. Emphasising the importance of organisational rules to enable reporters to negotiate this complicated environment, she expects further fragmentation and difficulties in locating credible sources. Sidhu is sure that the sector would adjust despite these obstacles like it has done in past upheavals.

What Readers Will Learn

1. How trust in media is eroding and what factors are driving this concerning trend

2. The real impact of AI on journalism jobs and why many journalists fear its implications

3. Which social media platforms journalists are embracing and abandoning in 2025

4. Why economic pressures continue to challenge journalists and how they're responding

5. How gender pay disparities persist in journalism despite increased awareness

6. The complexity of maintaining unbiased reporting in today's polarized media environment

7. How the press release remains a vital tool for journalism despite digital transformation

8. Practical insights for PR professionals looking to build better relationships with journalists

9. How the Australian media landscape compares to global journalism trends

10. What media professionals can expect in terms of platform evolution over the next year

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on Mencari

• 5 - Minute recap - for nightly bite-sized news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• The Expert Interview - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• Viewpoint 360 - An analysis view based on evidence, produced in collaboration with 360Info

• Mencari Banking - Get the latest banking news and financials across Australia and New Zealand

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this insightful interview, Dr. Susan Stone, Credit Union SA Chair of Economics at the University of South Australia, analyzes the recent implementation of a 25% tariff on Australian steel and aluminum exports to the United States by President Donald Trump.

While Prime Minister Albanese noted these exports represent only 0.2% of Australia's total export value, Dr. Stone explains the broader economic concerns, including potential global price increases and spillover effects on domestic industries.

Unlike Canada and Mexico, Australia has chosen not to implement retaliatory measures, focusing instead on a "buy Australian" campaign. Dr. Stone suggests this measured approach reflects Australia's strategic positioning for upcoming agricultural tariff negotiations, which could have a significantly larger impact on the Australian economy than the steel tariffs.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/Audio . A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

1. Limited Direct Impact: Australian steel and aluminum exports to the US represent only 0.2% of Australia's total export value, making the direct economic impact relatively small compared to countries like Canada and Mexico.

2. Global Price Effects: Despite the small direct impact, the tariff could trigger increased steel and aluminum prices globally, affecting Australian exporters in other markets through spillover effects.

3. Strategic Restraint: Unlike other affected nations, Australia has chosen not to implement retaliatory tariffs, preserving negotiating leverage for potentially more damaging agricultural tariffs expected in April.

4. Critical Minerals Leverage: Australia's reserves of critical minerals desired by the US could provide important negotiating leverage in future trade discussions.

5. WTO Options: Australia could signal seriousness by filing a World Trade Organization complaint, which would allow for authorized retaliatory measures without immediately escalating trade tensions.

About the Guest:

I am an economist with a keen interest in how things work - especially when trying to juggle competing interests like growth and sustainability. I undertake research and outreach on issues of importance to South Australians, notably that deal with the economy. I believe firmly in a few things including:

An education is a useful thing;

Prices are an imperfect mechanism to reflect value;

One needs to give back to the community.

Prior to joining UniSA Business I headed the Emerging Policy Issues Division at the OECD. That work focused on issues relating trade and the environment, the digital economy and subsidies. I also led the team that developed the OECD METRO model, a computable general equilibrium trade model. I spent two years at the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) as Director, Trade, Investment and Innovation Division where I worked with governments to support trade, trade facilitation, foreign direct investment, SME development, technology and technology transfer, and innovation.

My curisoity has led me to opportunities across the globe including as a Senior Research Fellow at the Asian Development Bank Institute in Tokyo, a Research Manager at the Productivity Commission in Melbourne and a Senior Analyst at the US Environmental Protection Agency in Washington DC. Way back in the beginning I worked as a Financial Valuation Analyst in the private sector.

A dual United-States/Australian citizen, I received my PhD in International Economics and a Master’s Degree in Business and Finance, from Drexel University in Philadelphia.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Dr. Susan Stone through University of SA

Detailed Synopsis

The interview begins with Miko Santos welcoming Dr. Susan Stone to discuss the recent announcement that Australia would not be exempted from the 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imposed by US President Donald Trump.

Dr. Stone immediately contextualizes the issue by acknowledging that while these exports represent a small percentage of Australia's overall trade, certain regions with concentrated steel and aluminum production will feel significant employment impacts. More concerning is the potential for global price increases in these commodities, creating spillover effects that could impact Australian producers even in markets where they have substantial presence.

When asked about potential government support measures similar to JobKeeper during COVID-19, Dr. Stone notes several mitigating factors: the limited size of the US market for Australian producers, and the fact that some Australian steel producers already have operations within the United States, allowing them to continue servicing the US market through domestic production.

The discussion turns to the Australian government's proposed "buy Australian" campaign. Dr. Stone explains the practical challenges in implementing such an initiative, particularly the difficulty in identifying products with Australian-sourced steel and aluminum inputs. However, she suggests this could create marketing opportunities for companies willing to verify and promote their use of Australian-sourced materials.

A significant portion of the interview addresses why Australia has not implemented retaliatory tariffs like Canada and Mexico. Dr. Stone explains this strategic restraint stems from Australia's different trade relationship with the US—Australia's trade volume with the US is substantially smaller than North American countries, where some sectors have 100% of their sales directed to the US market. More importantly, Australia is preserving negotiating capital for potential agricultural tariffs Trump has mentioned implementing in April, which would have a more substantial impact on Australia's beef and meat exports to the US.

Dr. Stone provides expert analysis on the counterproductive nature of protectionist trade policies, explaining that empirical evidence shows tariffs raise costs, increase prices, and create uncertainty that dampens business investment—ultimately undermining the stated goals of increasing manufacturing and jobs. This economic framework supports Australia's decision to maintain its current tariff structure to prevent price increases for Australian businesses and consumers.

The interview explores how the current Trump administration's approach differs from the previous implementation in 2018, when Australia and other allies received exemptions. Dr. Stone explains that the earlier tariffs primarily targeted China, while the current policy aims to boost domestic US production, leading to a blanket application without exemptions. Additionally, the implementation timeline was significantly accelerated, limiting opportunities for negotiation.

In addressing Australia's economic leverage, Dr. Stone critiques the Trump administration's narrow focus on goods trade surpluses, explaining that this overlooks critical aspects like investment flows and services. She highlights that Australia's strategic value extends beyond trade balances to critical minerals resources and regional security partnership, especially given US concerns about China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

The interview concludes with a discussion of Australia's policy options, including domestic "buy Australian" campaigns, leveraging critical mineral resources as a reliable partner, and potentially filing a WTO complaint to establish a legal basis for proportional retaliatory measures without immediately implementing them—signaling seriousness while preserving diplomatic relations.

What Readers Will Learn

1. Economic Context: Readers will gain insight into the complex economic implications of international tariffs beyond simple export percentages, including global price effects and supply chain impacts.

2. Strategic Trade Diplomacy: The interview provides a masterclass in how smaller economies navigate trade disputes with major powers, balancing immediate economic interests against longer-term strategic considerations.

3. Policy Mechanisms: Readers will understand the range of economic policy levers available to governments responding to tariffs, from domestic consumer campaigns to WTO dispute mechanisms.

4. Trade Theory Application: The discussion connects academic economic theory on protectionism with real-world policy outcomes, illustrating why most economists view tariffs as counterproductive.

5. Critical Industry Analysis: The interview offers valuable perspective on Australia's strategic resources and export sectors, highlighting which industries are most vulnerable to trade disputes.

6. Negotiation Strategy: Readers will learn about the strategic calculation behind Australia's measured response, preserving leverage for more economically significant agricultural tariff negotiations.

7. Global Trade Interconnections: The discussion illuminates how tariff decisions create ripple effects throughout international markets, affecting even countries and industries not directly targeted.

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on Mencari

• 5 - Minute recap - for nightly bite-sized news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• The Expert Interview - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• Viewpoint 360 - An analysis view based on evidence, produced in collaboration with 360Info

• Mencari Banking - Get the latest banking news and financials across Australia and New Zealand

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this episode, Dr. Alexia Maddox from La Trobe University discusses Meta's recent decision to move away from professional fact-checking towards a community-driven moderation system. She explains how this change could affect information quality on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, and what it means for users and society.

The conversation explores the timing of this decision, its potential impacts on vulnerable populations, and the broader implications for digital safety and democracy.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/Audio . A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• Meta's shift from professional fact-checking to community moderation represents a significant change in how misinformation will be handled on their platforms

• Research suggests that approximately 80% of content sharing occurs before community fact-checking can take effect, potentially allowing misinformation to spread rapidly

• The change coincides with broader reductions in content moderation approaches, including those addressing hate speech and harassment

• International tensions are emerging as different countries have varying regulations and expectations for social media platforms

• The shift may contribute to growing social polarization and reduced access to credible information, particularly affecting marginalized populations

About the Guest:

Alexia is Director of Digital Education and Senior Lecturer in Pedagogy and Education Futures in the School of Education.

Her main academic role is teaching into digital literacies units in the undergraduate and masters programs alongside and supporting students research projects.

She is passionate about student centred learning approaches and supporting students to achieve their learning goals. Alexia is a passionate educator and practices research outreach through community and media engagement. Alexia's disciplinary background is as a sociologist of technology and her research interests include investigating digital frontiers and socio-technical transformation.

Her most recent research draws together insights into emerging technology spaces with immersive environments/sensory experiences and technology trends surrounding artificial intelligence, machine learning, algorithmic processes, Web3, gamification, and play.

She combines a long-term interest in the social impacts of the internet with practical questions about human-technology encounters and how to research them. Alexia has published 17 peer-reviewed journal articles.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Dr. Alexia Maddox through La Trobe University

• Thanks Facebook for Mark Zuckerberg video aanouncement

Dr. Alexia Maddox provides an in-depth analysis of Meta's strategic shift away from professional fact-checking. She explains that while professional fact-checkers follow rigorous protocols and standards, community-driven moderation varies widely in quality and timeliness. The discussion explores how this change, combined with reduced content moderation overall, could impact vulnerable populations and the spread of misinformation.

The interview delves into international regulatory challenges, with Dr. Maddox highlighting tensions between US-based tech companies and other jurisdictions like the European Union and Australia. She discusses how this move signals a broader cultural shift, potentially leading to more permissive online environments and reduced user protections.

The conversation concludes with concerns about long-term societal impacts, including the potential proliferation of conspiracy theories and decreased trust in traditional information sources, especially in the context of growing AI-generated content.

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on The Evening Post AU

• Get Evening Post Wrap - for nightly bite size news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• Podwires Asia - for reporting on podcasting and audio trends in South East Asia

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• Anti - A __ - The world's and Asia's most inventive advertisements and news.

• The Freeman Chronicle Podcast - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• That Podcast Exchange - This podcast is an insightful conversation with people at the top of their game and deconstructs them to find the tools, tactics, and tricks to help you achieve your dream goal as Podcast Manager.

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this episode of Santos Unfiltered, host Miko Santos discusses the recent guilty verdict of former President Donald Trump in 34 felony cases with Dr. John Hart, an expert in American government and politics. They delve into Trump's reaction to the verdict, where he called it a rigged trial by a corrupt judge, and his assertion that the real verdict will come from the people on November 5th. Dr. Hart shares insights on the charges related to hush money payments and the evidence presented during the trial. Tune in for an in-depth analysis of this significant legal development.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/Audio . A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• [00:02:02] Guilty verdict on Trump.

• [00:09:37] Former president's criminal conviction.

• [00:11:22] Convicted felons running for office.

• [00:16:58] Challenges in sentencing Trump.

About the Guest:

Dr. John Hart is a distinguished political scientist and academic, known for his expertise in the government and politics of the United States. As a member of the Emeritus Faculty at the Australian National University (ANU) and former head of the Department of Political Science, Dr. Hart has made significant contributions to the field through his research and publications.

With a specialization in the American presidency and the U.S. electoral process, Dr. Hart has delved deep into the intricacies of the political landscape, offering valuable insights into the functioning of the government and the dynamics of power in the United States. His book, "The Presidential Branch: From Washington to Clinton," stands as a testament to his in-depth knowledge and scholarly acumen.

Throughout his career, Dr. Hart has published numerous articles in international journals, shedding light on various aspects of American government and politics. His dedication to academic rigor and intellectual inquiry has earned him respect and recognition within the academic community.

In the podcast episode, Dr. Hart's analysis of the recent verdict involving former President Donald Trump showcases his ability to dissect complex political issues with clarity and precision. His astute observations on the legal implications of the case highlight his deep understanding of the intersection between law and politics.

Dr. Hart's commitment to upholding the rule of law and his belief in the importance of democratic principles underscore his ethical stance as a scholar and a public intellectual. His nuanced perspective on the challenges facing the U.S. political landscape reflects his unwavering dedication to promoting transparency, accountability, and integrity in governance.

As a leading authority in the field of political science, Dr. Hart's insights continue to shape scholarly discourse and inform public debate on critical issues facing the United States and the world at large. His unwavering pursuit of truth and justice serves as a guiding light for future generations of political scientists and policymakers, inspiring them to uphold the highest standards of academic excellence and ethical conduct in their pursuit of a more just and equitable society.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Dr. John Hart through ANU Website

The guilty verdict in the New York hush money trial against former President Donald Trump is a significant demonstration of the rule of law prevailing in the United States. Dr. John Hart, a specialist in American government and politics, emphasized in a podcast episode that the verdict showcases that no individual, not even a former president, is exempt from the law. The charges against Trump involved falsifying business records to conceal hush money payments related to a sexual scandal during the 2016 election, constituting a felony offense due to violations of campaign finance laws.

The unanimous guilty verdict on all 34 counts and the swift delivery of the verdict after just a day and a bit of jury deliberations underscore the strength of the evidence presented. Dr. Hart highlighted that the verdict signifies that the rule of law is upheld in the United States, regardless of an individual's status or position. This outcome is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the legal system and reinforcing the principle that all individuals, including high-profile figures like former presidents, are subject to the same legal standards.

Furthermore, the podcast episode discussed the potential challenges the sentencing judge may face in determining an appropriate punishment for Trump. Despite the seriousness of the felony charges, experts suggest that Trump, as a first-time offender with nonviolent offenses, may not receive a prison sentence. The complexities of imprisoning a former president, including the need for Secret Service protection and special accommodations, add layers of difficulty to the sentencing process.

In conclusion, the guilty verdict in the New York hush money trial against former President Donald Trump not only highlights the accountability of individuals in positions of power but also reinforces the principle that the rule of law prevails in the United States. This landmark decision underscores the importance of upholding legal standards and ensuring that no individual, regardless of their status, is above the law.

The podcast episode also addressed the fact that despite being found guilty in the criminal case, Donald Trump can still run for president in 2024 due to the absence of constitutional provisions barring a convicted felon from running for office. Dr. John Hart explained that the Constitution only specifies three disqualification factors for presidential candidates: being a natural-born citizen, being at least 35 years old, and having been a resident of the United States for 14 years.

Dr. Hart elaborated on the challenges of amending the Constitution to include a disbarment clause based on a criminal record, emphasizing the complex process and low political likelihood of such an amendment. The episode shed light on the legal and constitutional framework that allows a convicted individual like Donald Trump to potentially seek the highest office in the United States, highlighting the complexities and limitations of the current system in preventing individuals with criminal records from running for president.

Regarding the sentencing judge's decision, various factors come into play, including Trump's status as a first-time offender and the nonviolent nature of the crime for which he was convicted. The logistical challenges of imprisoning a former president, such as the need for Secret Service protection, also add complexity to the sentencing process. Balancing these factors, the judge faces a delicate task in determining an appropriate punishment that considers both the severity of the offense and the unique circumstances surrounding the defendant.

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on The Evening Post AU

• Get Evening Post Wrap - for nightly bite size news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• Podwires Asia - for reporting on podcasting and audio trends in South East Asia

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• Anti - A __ - The world's and Asia's most inventive advertisements and news.

• The Freeman Chronicle Podcast - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• That Podcast Exchange - This podcast is an insightful conversation with people at the top of their game and deconstructs them to find the tools, tactics, and tricks to help you achieve your dream goal as Podcast Manager.

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

In this episode of the Freeman Chronicle podcast, Miko Santos discusses the recent arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Hamas leaders. The host interviews Dr. Juliet McIntyre, a lecturer in Law at UniSA, to gain insights into the legal implications of these arrest warrants.

Dr. McIntyre explains that the ICC's jurisdiction over the Gaza war is based on Palestine's acceptance of the court's jurisdiction, despite Israel not being a signatory to the Rome Statute.

She also discusses the role of international legal experts in shaping the legal arguments and the potential impact of the arrest warrants on the Israel-Palestine conflict and regional stability.

The host and Dr. McIntyre delve into the challenges and controversies surrounding the ICC's actions in this case, emphasizing the importance of upholding legal standards and accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity. They also touch on the potential responses from different countries and international actors to these developments.

Overall, the episode provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal complexities and implications of the ICC's actions in the Israel-Palestine conflict, shedding light on the role of international law in addressing atrocities during armed conflicts.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/Audio . A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• 00:00:00 - Introduction to ICC Arrest Warrants

• 00:05:30 - ICC Jurisdiction in the Gaza War

• 00:08:13 - Role of International Legal Experts

• 00:10:04 - Impact of Arrest Warrants on Israel-Palestinian Conflict

• 00:11:32 - Response of Countries and International Actors

• 00:12:47 - Challenges in Issuing Arrest Warrants

• 00:14:23 - Controversies Surrounding ICC Action

• 00:16:11 - Comparison with Other ICC Cases

About the Guest:

Dr Juliette McIntyre has been a Lecturer in Law at UniSA since 2016. She completed her PhD at the University of Melbourne under the supervision of Judge Hilary Charlesworth of the International Court of Justice and Professor Margaret Young. She also holds a first class LL.M. in International Law from the University of Cambridge, and a BA and LLB/LP with Honours. Her particular area of specialism is international courts and tribunals, with a focus on procedure.

Dr McIntyre's academic work has been published in a number of leading journals including the Australian Year Book of International Law, Journal of International Dispute Settlement,  AJIL Unbound, Michigan Journal of International Law, and Leiden International Law Journal, and the Ukrainian Law Review. She has significant litigation experience, including as a Judge's Associate at the Supreme Court of South Australia, and as counsel in cases before the International Court of Justice and other international tribunals. Dr McIntyre also writes commentary on current international legal issues for outlets such as The Interpreter, Opinio Juris, Völkerrechtsblog, EJIL:Talk! and The Conversation, and appears regularly in print, television and radio news services.

Previously, Dr McIntyre held academic posts at Charles Darwin University and Thompson Rivers University in Canada, and has been the recipient of the Law Foundation of South Australia Fellowship.

Dr McIntyre is active on social media and has been formally sanctioned by the Russian government for her work in respect of Ukraine.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Dr. Juliette through her Linkedin and UNISA Website

• Thank you to Australian Parliament for the short news report audio clip.

ICC jurisdiction in Gaza war.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) plays a crucial role in holding individuals accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. In the recent episode of the Freeman Podcast Chronicle, Dr. Juliet McIntyre, a lecturer in Law at UniSA, discussed the ICC's jurisdiction in the Gaza war and the recent arrest warrants issued for Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Hamas leaders.

The ICC's jurisdiction in the Gaza war is complex due to the involvement of multiple parties and the political dynamics in the region. The Palestinian Authority has accepted the court's jurisdiction, allowing the ICC to investigate and prosecute crimes committed in the state of Palestine. On the other hand, Israel is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, but the court can still exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a state party, in this case, Palestine.

The recent arrest warrants issued by the ICC Chief Prosecutor for Israeli officials and Hamas leaders highlight the court's commitment to holding individuals accountable for their actions in armed conflicts. Dr. McIntyre noted that the events in Gaza have been deteriorating, and there have been suspicions of war crimes and crimes against humanity being committed. The ICC's independent investigations have led to the conclusion that these crimes may have been committed, prompting the issuance of arrest warrants.

The response to the ICC's actions has been mixed, with some countries, such as Australia, acknowledging their legal obligations to support the court's investigations, while others, like the United States, have condemned the arrest warrants. Dr. McIntyre emphasized the importance of upholding legal standards and ensuring accountability for all individuals, regardless of their political affiliations or positions of power. The ICC exists to uphold these standards and ensure justice is served for victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

In conclusion, the ICC's jurisdiction in the Gaza war demonstrates the court's commitment to upholding international law and holding individuals accountable for their actions in armed conflicts. The recent arrest warrants issued for Israeli officials and Hamas leaders are a significant step towards justice and accountability in the region. It is essential for all parties involved to cooperate with the ICC's investigations and respect the court's decisions to ensure justice is served for all victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

ICC investigating crimes in Palestine.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has been investigating crimes in Palestine since 2019, following referrals from Palestine itself and other states parties. The court has jurisdiction over the territories occupied by Israel since 1967 and can prosecute individuals who have committed war crimes or crimes against humanity in the territory of Palestine. This includes Israeli officials who may have been involved in the commission of such crimes in Gaza.

The recent issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli officials and Hamas leaders by the ICC is a significant development in the pursuit of justice and accountability in the region. The involvement of a panel of international legal experts in shaping the legal argument and proceeding adds credibility to the investigation and emphasizes the seriousness of the crimes being investigated.

While the arrest warrants may not have an immediate impact on the ground in terms of stopping the conflict in Gaza, they could have wider implications for the region. The warrants may lead to a change in the attitudes of states external to Israel in terms of their support for the parties involved in the conflict. This could potentially impact negotiations for peace and the supply of arms to Israel.

Overall, the ICC's investigation into crimes in Palestine highlights the importance of upholding international law and ensuring accountability for individuals responsible for committing atrocities in armed conflicts. It is crucial for all parties involved to cooperate with the ICC's investigations and respect the court's decisions in order to achieve justice for all victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the region.

Impartial accountability for war crimes.

The ICC's role in holding individuals accountable for war crimes is essential in promoting peace and justice in conflict zones around the world. The Rome Statute, which established the ICC, has been ratified by 124 states parties, including Palestine. This means that these states are obligated to arrest suspects and deliver them to The Hague for trial if arrest warrants are issued by the court. This creates a situation where individuals like Netanyahu, who hold positions of power, may face restrictions on their travel and potential arrest if they enter territories of ICC member states.

The process of issuing arrest warrants involves a pretrial chamber of the court assessing whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspects have committed crimes within the court's jurisdiction. While the process can take some time, it is essential for the court to ensure that the evidence is strong and meets the legal standards required for issuing arrest warrants. In cases where warrants are denied, the prosecutor has the option to appeal, highlighting the importance of a fair and impartial judicial process.

Controversies surrounding the ICC's actions in this case, such as accusations of moral equivalency between the parties involved and attacks on the independence of the prosecutor, are manufactured and do not detract from the court's mandate to investigate and prosecute crimes against humanity and war crimes impartially. The prosecutor's commitment to upholding the rule of law and conducting investigations based on legal standards, regardless of political pressure or threats, demonstrates the ICC's dedication to achieving justice for victims of war crimes.

Comparing the situation with Israel to other cases where the ICC has investigated crimes committed during armed conflicts, it is clear that the court's mandate is to hold all individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their position or affiliation. The ICC's investigations into crimes in Palestine are a continuation of its efforts to address impunity and ensure accountability for atrocities committed in conflict zones globally. By upholding impartiality and conducting thorough investigations, the ICC plays a crucial role in promoting justice, peace, and respect for international law in the face of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Evidence is key in prosecution.

In the podcast transcript, Dr. Juliet McIntyre emphasizes the importance of evidence in prosecution. She highlights that each case is unique and cannot be compared to another because it ultimately comes down to the evidence available and what can be verified by the prosecutor. This underscores the crucial role that evidence plays in the legal process, particularly in criminal cases.

Evidence is key in prosecution for several reasons. Firstly, evidence is necessary to establish the guilt or innocence of the accused. Without evidence, it would be impossible to determine whether a crime has been committed and who is responsible for it. Evidence helps to build a case against the accused, demonstrating their involvement in the alleged criminal activity.

Secondly, evidence is essential for ensuring a fair trial. In a court of law, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to demonstrate the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. This requires presenting credible and admissible evidence that supports the prosecution's case. Without sufficient evidence, a conviction cannot be secured, and justice may not be served.

Moreover, evidence is crucial for protecting the rights of the accused. The principle of presumption of innocence requires that the accused is considered innocent until proven guilty. Evidence is needed to support the allegations against the accused and to prevent wrongful convictions based on speculation or bias. By relying on concrete evidence, the legal system can ensure that justice is served fairly and impartially.

In addition, evidence plays a critical role in holding perpetrators accountable for their actions. By presenting evidence of the accused's involvement in a crime, prosecutors can seek justice for victims and deter future criminal behavior. Evidence helps to establish a clear link between the accused and the crime, making it difficult for them to evade responsibility for their actions.

Overall, evidence is key in prosecution because it forms the foundation of a criminal case. Without evidence, it would be impossible to determine guilt or innocence, ensure a fair trial, protect the rights of the accused, and hold perpetrators accountable for their actions. As Dr. McIntyre emphasizes in the podcast, the gathering and presentation of evidence are essential components of the legal process, shaping the outcome of criminal cases and upholding the principles of justice and accountability.

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on The Evening Post AU

• Get Evening Post Wrap - for nightly bite size news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• Podwires Asia - for reporting on podcasting and audio trends in South East Asia

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• Anti - A __ - The world's and Asia's most inventive advertisements and news.

• The Freeman Chronicle Podcast - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• That Podcast Exchange - This podcast is an insightful conversation with people at the top of their game and deconstructs them to find the tools, tactics, and tricks to help you achieve your dream goal as Podcast Manager.

  ---

  Friendly reminder: Right now, every subscriber has access to all of our content, whether it is paid or free. However, this will only be available during a brief promotional time. Above all, money is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of an independent media company such as this one. In case you value our work and would like to participate in it, kindly think about endorsing us with a paid subscription.
  

  ---

Today’s episode is brought to you by Empower your podcasting vision with a suite of creative solutions at your fingertips.

On this episode of the FreeMan Podcast Chronicle, host Miko Santos discusses the recently announced Budget 2024 with guest Dr. Susan Stone, an expert in economics.

They delve into the details of the budget, including the 9.3 billion surplus and the 28.3 billion deficit projected for 2024 to 2025. Dr. Stone explains the concept of surplus and deficit in government finances, shedding light on the reasons behind these numbers. Tune in to gain insights into the budget implications and economic outlook for the future.

If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue this conversation with you, over twitter @realmikosantos!

This is not a sponsored video/Audio . A small commission will be paid to us if you purchase anything through some of the affiliate links in our product listings.

In this episode, we cover:

• [00:03:26] Budget impact on economic growth.

• [00:08:55] New housing investment plan.

• [00:10:51] Skills mismatch in Australia.

• [00:16:43] Rise in industrial policy.

About the Guest:

Susan Stone is the Credit Union SA Chair of Economics at UniSA, undertaking research on issues pivotal to the State of South Australia. Prior to joining UniSA Dr. Stone was a division head at the OECD, a Director for the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), a Senior Research Fellow at the Asian Development Bank Institute in Tokyo, a Research Manager at the Australian Productivity Commission in Melbourne and a Senior Analyst at the US Environmental Protection Agency in Washington DC.

Her work has been published as national and multinational government reports, edited volumes, and in peer-reviewed journals. Ms. Stone holds a PhD in Economics and a Master’s Degree in Business and Finance, from Drexel University in the United States.

Resources and links mentioned in this episode:

• Connect with Dr. Susan through her Linkedin and UNISA Website

• Thank you to Australian Parliament for the short news report audio clip.

One of the key points discussed in the podcast episode is the Budget for 2024, which includes a surplus for the current year but anticipates a deficit for the following year. The surplus in the current year is attributed to high tax revenue and strong commodity prices, allowing the government to bring in more money than it has spent. However, the following year is expected to see a shift in economic variables. Factors such as a potential increase in unemployment and uncertain commodity prices are likely to impact the government's revenue stream, leading to a deficit where spending exceeds income.

Dr. Susan Stone, the guest on the podcast, explains that the budget's surplus for the current year is a result of favorable economic conditions, such as high tax revenue and commodity prices. However, the anticipation of a deficit in the following year is due to the expectation of lower revenue and increased spending. This change in economic variables underscores the dynamic nature of budget planning and the need for flexibility to adapt to shifting economic conditions.

The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the economic landscape and adjusting budget projections accordingly. It also emphasizes the need for governments to be prepared for fluctuations in revenue and expenditure, especially in the face of uncertainties such as changing employment rates and commodity prices. By acknowledging and addressing these variables in budget planning, governments can better navigate economic challenges and ensure financial stability in the long term.

The 2024 budget, as discussed in the podcast episode, places a significant emphasis on addressing the cost of living for Australians. Various measures have been introduced to alleviate financial burdens and support individuals and businesses facing economic challenges. One of the key initiatives highlighted in the budget is the provision of a $300 electricity bill rebate for households, aimed at reducing the financial strain on families dealing with rising energy costs.

Additionally, the budget includes a 10% increase in rent assistance, acknowledging the difficulties faced by individuals struggling to afford housing. This measure is crucial in ensuring that vulnerable populations have access to affordable accommodation, thereby improving their overall quality of life.

Moreover, the budget allocates substantial support for small businesses, recognizing their importance in driving economic growth and employment opportunities. With 4 million small businesses set to benefit from $290 million in cash flow support, these initiatives aim to bolster the resilience of small enterprises and contribute to the recovery of the business sector.

Furthermore, the budget prioritizes $500 million for skill development, emphasizing the significance of investing in human capital and workforce training. By addressing skills shortages and enhancing the capabilities of the labor force, these initiatives not only support individuals in securing employment but also contribute to the overall productivity and competitiveness of the economy.

Overall, the budget's focus on cost of living measures, electricity bill rebates, rent assistance, and support for small businesses and skill development reflects a comprehensive approach to addressing economic challenges and improving the well-being of Australians. These initiatives demonstrate a commitment to fostering financial stability, promoting business growth, and enhancing the skills of the workforce to ensure a more prosperous and resilient future for the nation.

One of the key points discussed in the podcast episode is how the Budget 2024 aims to address specific issues such as housing supply, skills mismatch, and industrial policy. While these are crucial areas that need attention, there is a notable absence in directly tackling broader economic issues like the competitiveness of the business environment.

Dr. Susan Stone highlighted the importance of addressing the rise in industrial policy, where governments are increasingly involved in steering the economy in certain directions. This global trend, coupled with geopolitical tensions, is influencing corporate decision-making processes. Businesses are reevaluating factors such as where they operate, their supply chains, and future investments. To remain competitive in this evolving global landscape, Australia needs to demonstrate that it is a favorable place to do business. This involves having a skilled labor force, robust infrastructure, and a conducive business environment.

While the budget allocates funds for initiatives like new housing investments, skills training, and industrial policies, it may not directly address the broader issue of enhancing the business environment's competitiveness. Dr. Stone emphasized the importance of showcasing Australia as a desirable location for businesses by ensuring it has the necessary elements to support economic growth and attract investments. This includes creating a favorable regulatory environment, investing in infrastructure, and promoting innovation and entrepreneurship.

Therefore, while the budget takes steps to tackle specific challenges like housing supply and skills mismatch, there is a need for a more comprehensive approach to enhance the overall competitiveness of the business environment. By addressing these broader economic issues, Australia can position itself as a strong contender in the global market and drive sustainable economic growth in the long term.

🚀 TOOLS AND SERVICES I RECOMMEND:

🎥 My favorite's tagging, channel growth, and management tool for YouTubers

► Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://bit.ly/Tubebuddy-realmikosantos ► Download VidIQ ➜ https://bit.ly/vidIQ-realmikosantos

🎵 WHERE DO WE FIND OUR MUSIC:

► Epidemic Sound ➜ https://bit.ly/epidemicsound-AU

🎙️ OUR REMOTE RECORDING SOFTWARE

Zencastr - https://bit.ly/Zencastr-realmikosantos

📼 OUR PODCAST APPS ARE USING

• Transistor FM –

https://transistor.fm/?via=realmikosantos

• Captivate FM - https://www.captivate.fm/signup?ref=realmikosantos

• Fiverr - https://bit.ly/Fiverr-realmikosantos

• Canva - https://partner.canva.com/realmikosantos

• Headliner - https://bit.ly/Headliner-realmikosantos

📹 OUR VIDEO GEARS WE ARE USING

• DJI - https://bit.ly/DJI-realmikosantos

📼 MIKO'S KIT

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/documentary-kit

• https://kit.co/mikosantos/my-podcast-kit

This podcast is powered by Kangaroofern, Australia's Independent Podcast Management Company.

Thanks so much for listening to our podcast!

If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe so you'll be notified when a new episode is posted in the Apple podcast, Google podcast, Spotify, Stitcher or via RSS. 

If you think others could benefit from listening, please share it on your socials.

You can also subscribe to the podcast app on your mobile device. 

If you found value in this episode, leave us an Apple Podcast review. Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts and expose our show to more awesome listeners like you. 

This is a premium episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to the episodes, visit The Freeman Chronicle

Got a News Tip?

Contact our editor via Proton Mail encrypted, X Direct Message, LinkedIn, or email. You can securely message him on Signal by using his username, Miko Santos.

More on The Evening Post AU

• Get Evening Post Wrap - for nighly bite size news around Australia and the world.

• Podwires Daily - for providing news about audio trends and podcasts.

• Podwires Asia - for reporting on podcasting and audio trends in South East Asia

• There’s a Glitch - updated tech news and scam and fraud trends

• Anti - A __ - The world's and Asia's most inventive advertisements and news.

• The Freeman Chronicle Podcast - features expert interviews on current political and social issues in Australia and worldwide.

• That Podcast Exchange - This podcast is an insightful conversation with people at the top of their game and deconstructs them to find the tools, tactics, and tricks to help you achieve your dream goal as Podcast Manager.

  ---